Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
LLC INFRA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
VKPT SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition based on adjudicated debt. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the sub-subcontract and adjudication. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. judicial management and demand for payment. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. vkpt's arguments against the petition. (Para 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. indisputability of adjudication decisions. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. cipaa indisputability vs winding up policy. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. court's obligations and final decision. (Para 30 , 31) |
Introduction
[1] The Petitioner claims a debt for monies owed under two (2) decisions, being an adjudication decision dated 11 January 2024 ("the Adjudication Decision") under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA") and an order of the High Court dated 20 May 2024 ("the High Court Order").
(a) The Petitioner filed a winding up petition dated 23 September 2024 (Encl 1) ("the Petition") based on the aforesaid debt. In response, the Respondent filed a notice of application dated 28 November 2024 (Encl 21) for essentially, a stay of the Petition pending the hearing of the other application for the a stay of the Adjudication Decision in WA-24C-190-11/202
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
