A Registrar's Caveat is validly lodged under statutory powers, and the doctrine of res judicata does not apply if the party was not involved in the prior judgment.

Introduction

[1] At the core of the Plaintiff's application in encl 1 lies a principal request. The relief sought is the immediate withdrawal and cancellation of the Registrar's Caveat. In addition, the Plaintiff seeks further reliefs specifically directed against the Second Defendant.

[2] The submissions exchanged between the parties reveal a striking feature, that is, each side accuses the other of resorting to a 'backdoor approach' in pursuit of their respective objectives. These allegations underscore the contentious and tactical nature of the proceedings.

The Key Issues

[3] The principal issues are:

First, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to have the Registrar's Caveat withdrawn and cancelled; and

Second, whether the Plaintiff is entitled to general, exemplary and injunctive reliefs against the Second Defendant.

[4] In determining the first of the two principal issues, questions that have arisen include (i) whether the Plaintiff is entitled to rely on the doctrine of res judicata; and (ii) whether fraud has been established, as averred by the Defendants.

The Parties

[5] The Plaintiff, Visiber Sdn Bhd, is a company registered in Malaysia pursuant to the provisions of the Companies Act 1965 and is the registered owner of the land held under Hakmilik No.PM 3812 Lot 13964 Tempat Kampong Sungai Kayu Ara, Pekan Kayu Ara, Daerah Petaling, Negeri Selangor ("Kayu Ara Land").

[6] The First Defendant is the Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah Petaling, a government body involved with the administration of land matters in the District of Petaling.

[7] The Second Defendant, Kok Low Kau, is an individual having an address at No. 212, Kg. Cempedak, Sungai Way, Selangor.

The Prayers In The Originating Summons

[8] By way of encl 1, the Plaintiff had prayed for the following reliefs:

(a) for an order that the Registrar's Caveat [RC] bearing presentation number 08B4381/2024 lodged unlawfully and without basis on land held under Hakmilik No.PM 3812 Lot 13964 Tempat Kampong Sungai Kayu Ara, Pekan Kayu Ara, Daerah Petaling, Negeri Selangor [Kayu Ara Land] on 18 October 2024 at 12.21 pm. by the Pendaftar Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah Petaling pursuant to a police report bearing number DAMANSARA/014514/24 lodged by the Second Defendant [D2] on 27 September 2024 at Petaling Jaya Police Station be withdrawn and cancelled forthwith.

b) for an order that D2 pay general damages to the Plaintiff for all losses arising from the lodging of the RC which has caused a breach of the Joint Venture Agreement dated 5 January 2018 between the Plaintiff and the Developer, Laubros Ion World Sdn Bhd.

c) D2 by himself and/or his agents and/or his nominees and or partners and or anyone instructed by D2 be prohibited from commencing, filing or proceeding with any Court action and/or Court proceeding including but not limited to any application for any injunction and/or interim injunction and/or ad interim injunction and/or any other application in any form whatsoever in order to affect, prejudice, halt, hinder and /or to cause a failure of the Joint Venture Project between the Plaintiff and other parties or the management of the said Kayu Ara Land.

(d) General damages be assessed and be paid by D2;

(e) Exemplary damages be paid by D2;

(f) Costs; and

(g) Any further or other relief that the Court deems fit and proper.

[9] This Originating Summons in encl 1 is resisted by the First and the Second Defendants.

The Plaintiff's Version Of Events And Contentions

[10] The Plaintiff asserted that it had purchased the Kayu Ara Land from a compa