Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
DARVIN SATYA MANOKARAN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges and guilty plea details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's contentions on sentencing. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal principles on appeal and sentencing. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. analysis of sentencing under relevant laws. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. application of one transaction rule. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. court's conclusion on the appeal. (Para 19 , 20) |
Introduction
[1] The appellant was charged with two (2) offences of robbery under s 392 of the Penal Code (" PC ") read together with s 397 of the , namely-
Case No 62RS-20-08/2021
"Bahawa kamu pada 14 Ogos 2022 jam lebih kurang 1.31 pagi di KK Supermart no 45, Jalan PJS 11/7, Bandar Sunway dalam daerah Petaling, di dalam negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan telah dldapati melakukan rompak terhadap penama Nanda Kumar a/l Sivalingam kpt 971227-08-6139 dengan merompak wang jualan kedai yang berjumlah RM758 yang merupakan harta dalam kawalan penama tersebut dan semasa melakukan rompak tersebut, kamu telah menggunakan skru driver sebagai senjata. Oleh yang demikian, kamu telah melakukan kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 392 Kanun Keseksaan dan dibaca bersama s 397 Kanun Keseksaan"
(the 1st offenc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
