Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ARIANI TEXTILES & MANUFACTURING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
GULATIS EXCLUSIVE SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's copyright ownership established. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 19) |
| 2. defendant's arguments against copyright validity. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 29) |
| 3. plaintiff's locus standi confirmed. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 4. defendant's contradictory positions noted. (Para 34 , 35 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 5. requirements for copyright subsistence clarified. (Para 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. criteria for copyright infringement established. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 7. high degree of similarity confirms infringement. (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 8. defendant's absence of key witness affects case. (Para 66 , 70 , 71 , 72) |
| 9. plaintiff's designer credibility affirmed. (Para 74 , 75) |
| 10. defendant's argument about raid witnesses addressed. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79) |
| 11. exhibits not seized but relevant to case. (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 85) |
Introduction
[1] After a full trial, this Court allowed the Plaintiff's claims for copyright infringement against the Defendant, dismissed the Defendant's counterclaim, and ordered the following:
(i) A permanent injunction to restrain the Defendant, whether acting by himself or otherwise from doing the following acts or things or any of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
