SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 1174

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
PP – Appellant
Versus
RAVICHANTHIRAN GANESAN – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shahnaz Sulaiman JC:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned Magistrate in Johor Bahru given on 28 April 2021 who found the appellant had failed to prove a prima facie case against the respondent and proceeded to acquit and discharge the respondent at the end of the prosecution case.?

Background

The Charge

[2] In this case, the respondent was charged at the Magistrates' Court in Johor Bahru for an offence under s 186 of the Penal Code . The charge against the respondent reads as follows:

"Pertuduhan Pindaan

Bahawa kamu pada 29 May 2019 jam lebih kurang 1230 tengah hari bertempat di Pejabat Siasatan Jenayah Komersial IPD Johor Bahru Selatan, di dalam daerah Johor Bahru, di dalam negeri Johor Darul Takzim, telah dengan sengaja telah menghalang anggota polis menjalankan tugas dengan enggan memberi kerjasama bagi membantu siasatan yang sedang dijalankan. Oleh yang demikian, kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 186 Kanun Keseksaan"

Brief Facts

[3] On 29 May 2019 at 12.30noon at the Pejabat Siasatan Jenayah Komersial IPD Johor Bahru Selatan, Insp Calvin Joseph (SP1) recorded the respondent's statement pursuant to s 112 of the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top