Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SITI HASNAH VANGARAMA ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
TUN DR MAHATHIR MOHAMAD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegation of wrongful conversion (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. jurisdictional dispute over religious conversion (Para 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. defendants' claim of exclusive jurisdiction (Para 7 , 8 , 12 , 18 , 20) |
| 4. civil courts' jurisdiction over fundamental rights (Para 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. clarification of plaintiff's claims. (Para 22) |
| 6. court's analysis on jurisdiction. (Para 28) |
| 7. defendants argue jurisdiction issues. (Para 29) |
| 8. judicial caution in jurisdiction matters (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 9. appeal decision with costs awarded (Para 34) |
[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High Court of Penang which had allowed the respondents' applications (all the four respondents filed separate applications) pursuant to O 18 r 19(1) (limbs (a) to(d)) of the Rules of the High 1980 to strike out the appellant's originating summons action.
[2] The appellant (the plaintiff before the High Court; and, hence, after this shall be referred to in this judgment as 'the plaintiff') in her originating summons action before the High Court had sought a declaration that the respondents (the defendants before the High Court: and shall hereinafter be referred to as 'the defendants') i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
