Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
DEEPANRAJ SUBRAMANIAN V.PP
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant charged and convicted of culpable homicide. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against conviction outlined. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court upheld trial judge's findings on self-defense. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court dismissed speculation over dna evidence and its value. (Para 16 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. discrepancies in witness testimonies examined and ruled non-material. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. caution advised in treating evidence of interested witnesses. (Para 27 , 28 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. investigation shortcomings noted but deemed not material. (Para 37 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. amendment of charge properly justified by trial findings. (Para 45 , 46 , 48 , 49) |
| 9. court found no violation of procedural rights in amended charge. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 10. judgment quality discussed; found to meet necessary standards. (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
[1] The appellant was charged for the murder of one Karinathan a/l Ananthasegaran under s 302 of the Penal Code . At the end of the prosecution case, the learned trial judge amended the charge to one under s 304(a) of the and ordered the appellant to enter his defence. At the close of the defence case, the appe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
