Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
LAI HEN BENG – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional challenge regarding s 498 of the penal code (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. interpretation of article 8 of the federal constitution (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. appellant's argument against s 498 (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. respondent's defense of s 498 (Para 23 , 24) |
| 5. court's conclusion on unconstitutionality of s 498 (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. discussion on pre-merdeka laws (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. understanding existing laws under the federal constitution (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. judicial interpretation of pre-merdeka laws (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 9. judicial amendment and its limitations (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 10. criteria for determining pre-merdeka laws (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 11. implications of the findings on s 498 (Para 71 , 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 12. judicial limitations in constitutional references (Para 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79) |
| 13. options for modifying s 498 (Para 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86) |
| 14. judicial amendment versus judicial legislation (Para 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92) |
| 15. conclusion on the |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
