SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 64

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
WIRE & WIRELESS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MOHD TAIB HASSAN & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Vinodh Vallyeason ,Respondent Advocate: Emmy Hazwani Jamil

Table of Content
1. judgment in default requires procedural compliance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. parties involved in the litigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. defendants argue judgment was irregular. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24)
4. plaintiff defends service validity and judgment. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 29)
5. citations to support arguments. (Para 31 , 32)
6. service of writ must adhere to rules. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 37)
7. defence on merits must be shown. (Para 39 , 40)
8. time limits for setting aside judgment. (Para 41 , 42 , 43)
9. court finds no irregularity in judgment. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
10. application to set aside judgment dismissed. (Para 52 , 56)
Choong Yeow Choy JC:

[1] The Rules of Court 2012 deal with a variety of matters that relate to the civil litigation process. Amongst others, they prescribe the procedures to be followed by the parties. The demand for compliance with the provisions in the gives rise to two interrelated problems. Not every provision is couched in clear and unambiguous terms. Hence the need to interpret and give effect to the intention as envisioned by the Rules Committee. While there are instances whereby provisions exist to guide the Courts in dealing with this aspect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top