HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PE SETIA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MANGKUBUMI SDN BHD – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: BA-22C-6-03/2022]
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over non-payment for subcontractor work. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of contractual agreements and sums. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. termination of contract due to alleged delays. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. claims for outstanding balance and deductions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. measurement and re-measurement of works. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. acknowledgment of certain backcharges. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. allegation of unlawful contract termination. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. defendant's defense on payments and backcharges. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. claims regarding quantum meruit are barred. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 10. preliminary objections raised regarding procedures. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 11. court’s stance on adjudication decisions. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 12. verification of revised contract documentation. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 13. finality of interim payment certificates vs jms. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 14. importance of evidence in payment claims. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 15. assessment and reliability of the jms. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 16. determining entitlement to disputed backcharges. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 17. assessment of contract termination validity. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 18. defendant's justification for contract termination. (Para 58 , 59) |
| 19. final judgment on the claims made. (Para 60) |
A. Introduction
[1] This is a typical dispute between the Defendant (main contractor) and the Plaintiff (sub-contractor) in relation to non-payment for work done. The dispute between them escalated to the Plaintiff's contract being terminated and had led to the Plaintiff having to file this suit against the Defendant.
[2] The Plaintiff's action against the Defendant is to claim for the balance payment due for the works done together with the retention sum and loss of profit arising from the termination which the Plaintiff disputes as unlawful termination.
B. Brief Background
[3] Pursuant to a Letter of Acceptance of Tender dated 18 February 2016, Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR) appointed the Defendant as the main contractor for upgrading works for Federal Road 5 (FR5) from Tanjong Karang to Sabak Bernam, Selangor Darul Ehsan ("the Project") for the contract price of RM708,928,000.00 (including the total GST of RM40,128,000.00).
[4] Via a Letter of Award dated 28 April 2016 (LOA), together with the Sub-contract Agreement, the Defendant appointed the Plaintiff as the sub-contractor to perform Pavement Works and Road Furniture works under the Project for the contract sum amounting to RM104,117,800.40 (including total GST amounting to RM5,893,460.40). Subsequently, the parties revised the contract sum to RM91,844,175.22.
[5] The Defendant had made some payments for the Plaintiff's works in the project and had subsequently terminated the Plaintiff's contract on the basis that the Plaintiff had failed to complete the work within the time frame given, as per the required specifications and performance required.
[6] The Defendant had backcharged / deducted from the Plaintiff's payment sums due to the Defendant's advance payments, stamping of contract documents, consultant's overtime claim, patching of potholes, roadline marking, road stud, compensation for accident and fine for breaching Site's Safety Requirements.
[7] The Plaintiff has filed this suit against the Defendant in order to claim for the alleged balance sums which were not paid for the works done and against the backcharges / deductions which it disagrees. The Plaintiff also challenged the termination of its contract by the Defendant as unlawful.
[8] Due to the unlawful termination, the Plaintiff is entitled for the balance payments for works done under the contract and for loss of profit due amounting to a total of RM24,937,230.22 [(RM23.354,170.67 + RM 1,583,059.55) inclusive of GST and Retention Sum of RM4,592,208.75].
[9] Based on the Defendant's Statement of Defence, the Defendant has paid to the Plaintiff together with the Retention Sum a total of RM62,521,926.86 inclusive of all the backcharges / deductions for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.