SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 2355

MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PENDAKWA RAYA LWN. TAN KOK LONG


Petitioner Advocates:Mohamed Heikal Ismail ,Respondent Advocate: Dato' Rosal Azimin Ahmad,Mohd Anif Rafi

Table of Content
1. defendant charged under drug distribution law (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of drug seizure and evidence gathered (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. prosecution outlines essential elements of offense (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. prosecution's argument on possession and knowledge (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
5. prosecution fails to establish intent to distribute (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. defense highlights prosecution's failures in evidence (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
7. court's analysis on evidence inconsistencies (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
8. significance of witness testimonies and evidence gaps (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70)
Latifah Mohd Tahar H:

Pengenalan

[1] Dalam kes ini, izin mendakwa telah diberikan di bawah s 39B(3) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 ("ADB") (ekshibit P1), tertuduh telah dituduh atas kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 ("ADB") kerana disyaki mengedar dadah methamphetamine sebanyak 4,181.5gram. Menurut kertas pertuduhan (ekshibit P2), ia menyatakan seperti berikut:

"BAHAWA KA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top