Back
HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
PETER DION – Appellant
Versus
ABU MASUD MAHDI & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's dissatisfaction and grounds for appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background of the accident and injuries (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. findings and decisions of the learned scj (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. plaintiff's contentions and errors in liability finding (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. plaintiff's arguments on quantum of damages (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. arguments regarding costs and errors (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. defendants' counterarguments on liability (Para 29 , 30) |
| 8. law on appeals and reluctance to interfere (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. court's finding of fact on liability (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 10. assessment of negligence and liability findings (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 11. quantum of damages relating to general and special damages (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
Introduction
[1] The appellant, Peter anak Dion (hereinafter referred to as "plaintiff") appeals to the High Court against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge (hereinafter referred to as "learned SCJ") delivered on the 27 November 2023 in respect of the apportionment of liability
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
