SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 3263

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK TAWAU
PP – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMAD AHMAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Nur Nisla Abd Latif ,Respondent Advocate: Darmin Achok

Table of Content
1. facts of the case and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
2. court’s duty in evaluating prima facie case (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. ingredients for proving trafficking charge (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
4. evaluation of evidence for possession of drugs (Para 22 , 24 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 30)
5. chain of custody and integrity of evidence (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 39)
6. credibility of defense and burden of proof (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 74 , 76)
7. conclusion and sentencing rationale (Para 80 , 81 , 82 , 86)
Duncan Sikodol J:

[1] The accused, Muhammad Ahmad is charged for trafficking in dangerous drugs under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("DDA") and punishable under s 39B(2) of the same. The trafficking charge against the accused reads as follows:

The Charge

"Bahawa kamu, pada 8 haribulan Ogos 2023, jam lebih kurang 10.10 pagi bertempat di kawasan Jeti Awam Pelabuhan Tawau, di dalam daerah Tawau, di dalam Negeri Sabah. telah mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu Methamphetamine seberat 4,834.1 gram dan dengan itu kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama."

C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top