Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
FGV PLANTATIONS (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MYEG SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the case proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant's failure to comply with timelines. (Para 3 , 20 , 22 , 24) |
| 3. procedural law and compliance essentials. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. background facts regarding permit renewals. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. rules on late appearance and the consequences. (Para 19 , 32 , 39) |
| 6. court discretion and factors influencing it. (Para 26 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. importance of procedural adherence in litigation. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. dismissal of application and costs implications. (Para 40 , 41) |
| 9. litigation outcomes based on procedural missteps. (Para 43 , 45) |
| 10. conclusion emphasizing procedural compliance. (Para 49) |
Parties Cannot Arrogate Unto Themselves Their Own Timelines To Comply With The Timelines Prescribed By The Rules Of Court 2012 Which Have Statutory Force Of Law
Introduction
[1] This is the grounds of judgment for two of this Court's decisions. One was made on 5 June 2025 dismissing with costs the defendant's Notice of Application dated 21 March 2025 (Encl 7) and the other made immediately thereafter, on the same day where by consent of both the defenda
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
