HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MAHENDRAN SUPPIAH – Appellant
Versus
GRYPHON ENERGY (SEA) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. wrongful termination due to refusal to sign financial statements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of oral promises require careful factual examination. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. res judicata prevents re-litigation of the same issue. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. claims time-barred under limitation act. (Para 11 , 12 , 82) |
| 5. illegally obtained evidence's admissibility is complex and case-dependent. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 40) |
| 6. claims dismissed due to lack of evidence and being time-barred. (Para 107) |
Introduction
[1] This claim by the plaintiff stems from the embroilment of dissatisfaction that the plaintiff had whilst working for the defendants. Their relationship ended in May 2019 when the plaintiff as the director, refused to sign the company's financial statements that he purportedly said lacked adequate supporting documentation. The plaintiff did not accept the reason that the documents were unavailable because of the ransomware virus that affected the accounting records and maintained his position in not signing to approve the financial statements. His refusal prompted the 2nd defendant to remove him as director and appoint his brother as the new director, who th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.