Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
HOO WEI MENG – Appellant
Versus
WONG ZI PING – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transaction's background and financial conditions (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. transfer's notification and consent issues (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. plaintiff's and defendant's arguments (Para 18 , 19) |
| 4. principal issue determination about spa (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. definition and examples of sham agreements (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. suspicious circumstances indicating sham (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. non-payment of purchase price (Para 30 , 34 , 35 , 44) |
| 8. lack of proper legal representation (Para 36 , 48 , 49) |
| 9. absence of possession and buy-back clause (Para 56 , 60) |
| 10. loan categorized under moneylenders act (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 67) |
| 11. illegality and void contracts (Para 74 , 75 , 76) |
| 12. transfer resulting from the void spa (Para 79 , 80 , 82) |
| 13. final judgment and order outcomes (Para 85 , 86 , 87) |
Introduction
[1] This suit concerns a piece of land situated at Daerah Seberang Perai Tengah, Pulau Pinang ("land"). Originally, the land was owned by the Plaintiff ("P"). It was subsequently transferred to the Defendant ("D"). P claims that the transfer is void and sues to recover the land.
[2] After a full trial,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
