Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
CHAN LENNON – Appellant
Versus
TAN HUEY ZI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the appeal process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. main issue on appeal: appealable error. (Para 3) |
| 3. background facts leading to application. (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. decisions of sessions court on discovery. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. legal principles regarding discovery. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. court's decision on bank statements. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 8. limitations on discovery for future documents. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 9. conclusion regarding costs. (Para 22) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant (D1 in the Sessions Court) against thedecision of the Sessions Court on 26 July 2024 in allowing the Respondent's(D2 in the Sessions Court) application pursuant to O 24 for discovery ofdocuments (in the form of bank statements).
[2] To all intents and purposes, this discovery application relates to twodistinct documents. The first is the Appellant's bank statement forNovember, 2022 and the second are the Appellant's bank statements afterNovember, 2022.
The Central Issue
[3] The key issue for consideration by this Court is whether the learnedSessions Court Judge had made any appealable error in exercising herdiscretion
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
