HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KOTA KINABALU
FAIZAL SAINGKIN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charge and initial findings of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. corroboration needs and legal standards. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. judicial considerations on child witness evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. importance of specifying alleged offense date. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. testimony regarding the incident timeframe. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. consideration of police report contents. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. prosecution's failure to corroborate evidence. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
Introduction
[1] The appellant was charged with an offence under s 14(a) read with s 16(1) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 ("the Act") for the alleged physical sexual assault on his biological daughter, who was at the time only 10 years old.
[2] After a full trial, he was convicted and was sentenced by the Sessions Court to 5 years imprisonment from the date of conviction and 2 strokes of whipping. He was also ordered to be placed under Police Supervision for 3 years under s 27 of the Act after serving sentence and to undergo a rehabilitative counselling within the period of his detention in prison
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.