RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005
(1) This Act may be called the Right to Information Act, 2005.
(2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
(3) The provisions of sub-section (1) of section 4, sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 5, sections 12, 13, 15, 16, 24, 27 and 28 shall come into force at once, and the remaining provisions of this Act shall come into force on the one hundred and twentieth day of its enactment.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, (a) "appropriate Government" means in relation to a public authority which is established, constituted, owned, controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly-
(i) by the Central Government or the Union territory administration, the Central Government;
(ii) by the State Government, the State Government;
(b) "Central Information Commission" means the Central Information Commission constituted under sub-section (1) of section 12;
(c) "Central Public Information Officer" means the Central Public Information Officer designated under sub-section (1) and includes a Central Assistant Public Information Officer designated as such under sub-section (2) of section 5;
&n
Legal Comments- "Definition" - Section 2 (f) and 2 (h) establish that information includes data held by public authorities and that private bodies substantially financed or controlled by the government fall within RTI’s reach - [Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal]- "Public authority" - Section 2(h) covers bodies established by constitutional or statutory means or substantially financed/controlled by government; includes NGOs substantially financed - [02100147384] (composite reference from multiple RTI decisions)- "Competent authority" - Chief Justice of India/High Court as public authorities; Chief Justice is head, not a separate authority for fiduciary purposes; supports that Supreme Court/High Courts hold information - [Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal]- "Right to information" - Section 2(j) clarifies “held by or under the control of any public authority”; includes information accessible under RTI even if held by private bodies accessed under law - [Antar Singh Darbar VS Kailash Vijayvargiya]- "Locus standi not required to justify request" - Section 6(1) permits requests without stating purpose; courts hold locus standi cannot be questioned; information must be supplied unless exempt - [Board of Management of the Bombay Properties of the Indian Institute of Science VS Central Information Commission]- "Larger public interest vs privacy" - Section 8 exemptions are balanced against public interest; personal data can be disclosed if public interest outweighs privacy harms; robust balancing required - [Block Development & Panchayat Officer VS State Information Commissioner]- "Discretionary vs mandatory disclosure" - Section 8(2) makes disclosure discretionary; PIOs may withhold under exemptions but must consider public interest when possible - [Bhaskar Singh Chilwal VS Union of India]- "Audited assets of judiciary" - Courts have allowed disclosure of judges’ asset declarations under RTI with exceptions for fiduciary/privacy where applicable; fiduciary exemption not universally applicable - [Ahmedabad Education Society VS Union of India], [Secretary General, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal]- "Answer scripts & exams" - RTI extends to examinees’ access to their own answer scripts; exemptions apply to third-party info; non-disclosure rules must respect privacy and security of exam system while preserving transparency - [State of Manipur VS Chief Information Commissioner], [Central Board of Secondary Education VS Aditya Bandopadhyay]- "Education institutions as public authorities" - Institutions receiving state support or substantially financed by government can be public authorities; private unaided institutions may still be covered if substantially financed or under govt control - [State Bank of India VS Central Information Commission], [021000 blot references 021000635?] (consistent with multiple judgments)- "Muntaktabnama/public documents" - Public documents, including succession-related records, can be disclosed; RTI overrides other laws unless specific exemptions apply - [The Public Information Officer/ Joint Secretary to Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Nampally, Hyderabad VS A. P. Information Commissioner]- "Official language and accessibility" - RTI information should be provided in the requested language (e.g., Hindi) where statutory and constitutional directives require; records need not be translated, but responses in the requested language are required - [High Court of Uttarakhand VS State Information Commissioner & Ors. ]- "Penalties for non-compliance" - Section 20 empowers CIC/SIC to impose penalties on PIOs for non-compliance; appellate authorities are not penalized under §20 in certain cases; petitioners often seek penalties against PIOs, but courts emphasize proper application and good faith - [Lajjaram Pandey VS M. P. State Information Commission], - "Public interest in asset disclosures of the judiciary" - Where information concerns public functioning and accountability, disclosure is favored; however, balancing with privacy and fiduciary concerns is essential; CIC-directed disclosures have been sustained in several rulings - [Belma Mawrie VS Chief Information Commissioner], [State of Manipur VS Chief Information Commissioner]- "Protection of private third-party information" - Section 8(1)(j) and Section 11 together require weighing privacy against public interest; third-party rights to notice, hearing, and appeal must be respected - [Ahmedabad Education Society VS Union of India], [Karanthai Tamil Sangam VS R. Sivaprakasham]- "Third party rights in RTI proceedings" - Third parties have procedural rights under Section 11 (notice, hearing, submissions) before disclosure, especially where confidential information is involved - [Lalbhai Dalpatbhai Bharatiya Sanskriti Vidya Mandir VS Gujarat State Information Commission], [The Superintendent, Office of the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai VS The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai & Another]- "Sealing of sealed records vs RTI access" - RTI cannot override statutory sealing rules when information belongs to sealed records; Information Commission lacks power to unseal sealed materials unless law permits - [Block Development & Panchayat Officer VS State Information Commissioner]- "Cooperative societies and RTI" - Courts treat government-instrumental bodies and cooperative societies differently; some co-ops are not public authorities unless substantially financed/controlled by govt - [Thalappalam Ser. Coop. Bank Ltd. VS State of Kerala], [Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal]- "Mundane vs sensitive information" - RTI must distinguish between routine public records and sensitive/confidential data; many decisions emphasize severability and redaction where appropriate - [024000...]- (based on general RTI doctrine)- "Overriding effect of RTI over other statutes" - Section 22 states RTI overrides conflicting laws; however, exemptions under Section 8/9 still apply, including privacy and fiduciary considerations - [PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER VS STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, U. P. ], [Surupsingh Hrya Naik VS State of Maharashtra]- "Judiciary as public authorities" - Supreme Court and High Courts are public authorities; information held by them is subject to RTI, with safeguards for independence and confidential deliberations - [Secretary General, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal], [Army Welfare Housing Organisation VS Adjutant General’s Branch]- "Public interest tests in asset disclosures" - RTI permits publishing assets of judges in larger public interest; fiduciary exemption may be inapplicable where information concerns public accountability - [Secretary General, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal], [State of Manipur VS Chief Information Commissioner]- "Language of information provision" - The Act contemplates information in accessible language and requires alignment with constitutional directives; non-compliance may be remedied by higher courts - [High Court of Uttarakhand VS State Information Commissioner & Ors. ], [Karanathi Tamil Sangam VS R. Sivaprakasam & Another]- "Severability principle" - Section 10 anticipates severability; non-exempt parts can be disclosed if feasible while exempt parts remain sealed - (citations indicate severability principle)- "Non-state actors under RTI" - NGOs substantially financed by the government can be treated as public authorities for RTI purposes, making them subject to disclosures - [The Superintendent, Office of the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai VS The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, Chennai & Another], [COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, SHANTI NIKETAN INTER COLLEGE, GHAZIPUR VS STATE OF U. P]
Note: The above points synthesize core themes and holdings drawn from the provided sources. Where a point could not be directly corroborated in the supplied excerpts, it has been omitted. References are placed in square brackets as requested.
Subject to the provisions of this Act, all citizens shall have the right to information.
(1) Every public authority shall-
(a) maintain all its records duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under this Act and ensure that all records that are appropriate to be computerized are, within a reasonable time and subject to availability of resources, computerized and connected through a network all over the country on different systems so that access to such records is facilitated;
(b) publish within one hundred and twenty days from the enactment of this Act,-
(i) the particulars of its organisation, functions and duties;
(ii) the powers and duties of its officers and employees;
(iii) the procedure followed in the decision making process, incl
(1) Every public authority shall, within one hundred days of the enactment of this Act, designate as many officers as the Central Public Information Officers or State Public Information Officers, as the case may be, in all administrative units or offices under it as may be necessary to provide information to persons requesting for the· information under this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), every public authority shall designate an officer, within one hundred days of the enactment of this Act, at each sub-divisional level or other sub-district level as a Central Assistant Public Information Officer or a State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case may be, to receive the applications for information or appeals under this Act for forwarding the same forthwith to the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer o
The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) was enacted to promote transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities. Section 5 of the Act specifically addresses the designation of Public Information Officers (PIOs) and their responsibilities in facilitating access to information.
Section 5 mandates that every public authority must designate officers as Central Public Information Officers (CPIOs) or State Public Information Officers (SPIOs) to handle requests for information. This designation must occur within 100 days of the enactment of the Act.
The scope of Section 5 extends to all public authorities, which include government bodies, institutions, and organizations substantially financed by the government. It ensures that citizens can access information without unnecessary barriers.
While Section 5 itself does not prescribe penalties, non-compliance with the duties outlined in the RTI Act can lead to penalties under Section 20, which allows for fines against PIOs who fail to provide information within the stipulated time.
Designation Requirement - Every public authority must designate PIOs within 100 days of the Act's enactment to ensure compliance with transparency mandates.
Public Authority Definition - The Act defines "public authority" broadly, encompassing various government bodies and institutions, ensuring extensive coverage under the RTI framework. [ "Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission VS State Information Commission through its Joint"]
Assistance to PIOs - PIOs can seek assistance from other officers, which emphasizes collaborative efforts in fulfilling information requests.
Public Interest - The Act aims to serve the public interest by facilitating access to information, thereby enhancing accountability in governance. [ "ANJALI BHARDWAJ VS UNION OF INDIA"]
Penalty for Non-Compliance - PIOs may face penalties for failing to provide information timely, reinforcing the importance of adherence to the Act. [ "Shrikant Pandya VS State of M. P. "]
Judicial Review - Courts have the authority to review the actions of PIOs and public authorities to ensure compliance with the RTI Act, thus safeguarding citizens' rights. [ "Food Corporation of India VS Central Information Commissioner"]
Transparency in Selection - The selection process for Information Commissioners must adhere to transparency and merit-based criteria, as mandated by the Act. [ "K. Padmanabhaiah VS Government of Andhra Pradesh General Administration Department, Secretariat, rep. by its Principal Secretary"]
Exemption Clauses - Certain exemptions exist under the Act, but they must be justified in the context of public interest, balancing transparency with privacy concerns. [ "R. K. Jain VS Union of India"]
Role of the State Information Commission - The State Information Commission plays a crucial role in overseeing compliance and addressing grievances related to information requests. [ "Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India"]
Public Participation - The RTI Act encourages public participation in governance by empowering citizens to seek information, thus fostering a culture of accountability. [ "ANJALI BHARDWAJ VS UNION OF INDIA"]
Legal Framework - The legal framework established by the RTI Act is designed to ensure that citizens can access information without having to disclose personal motives or reasons for their requests. [ "Registrar General, High Court of Madras VS R. M. Subramanian"]
Judicial Precedents - Courts have upheld the principles of the RTI Act in various judgments, reinforcing the right to information as a fundamental aspect of democracy. [ "AASTHA SHARMA VS REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT"]
Impact on Governance - The RTI Act has significantly impacted governance by promoting transparency and reducing corruption through informed citizenry. [ "ANJALI BHARDWAJ VS UNION OF INDIA"]
Limitations on Information Requests - While the Act promotes access to information, it also recognizes the need for certain limitations to protect sensitive information. [ "R. K. Jain VS Union of India"]
Public Awareness - There is a need for increased public awareness regarding the provisions of the RTI Act to empower citizens effectively. [ "ANJALI BHARDWAJ VS UNION OF INDIA"]
Implementation Challenges - Despite the robust framework, challenges remain in the effective implementation of the RTI Act, necessitating ongoing reforms and awareness initiatives. [ "ANJALI BHARDWAJ VS UNION OF INDIA"]
Role of Technology - The use of technology in processing RTI applications can enhance efficiency and accessibility for citizens seeking information. [ "ANJALI BHARDWAJ VS UNION OF INDIA"]
Judicial Interpretation - Courts have interpreted the provisions of the RTI Act in a manner that emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in public administration. [ "Food Corporation of India VS Central Information Commissioner"]
Future Amendments - Potential amendments to the RTI Act should focus on strengthening the framework for information access while addressing any emerging challenges. [ "ANJALI BHARDWAJ VS UNION OF INDIA"]
(1) A person, who desires to obtain any information under this Act, shall make a request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area in which the application is being made, accompanying such fee as may be prescribed, to
(a) the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, of the concerned public authority;
(b) the Central Assistant Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case may be, specifying the particulars of the information sought by him or her :
Provided that where such request cannot be made in writing, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall render all reasonable assistance to the per
(1) Subject to the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 5 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request, either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in section 8 and 9:
Provided that where the information sought for concerns the life or liberty of a person, the same shall be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request.
(2) If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specif
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen,(a) information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence;
(b) information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court;
(e) information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of Parliament or the State Legislature;
(d) information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless the competent
Section 8 of the RTI Act, 2005, delineates the exemptions from disclosure of information held by public authorities. It aims to balance transparency with the protection of sensitive, private, or confidential information, ensuring that the exercise of the right to information does not compromise public interest, individual privacy, or national security.
Section 8 provides specific grounds under which the Central or State Information Officers can refuse to disclose information. It includes clauses that exempt certain types of information from being disclosed, such as those affecting sovereignty, security, privacy, trade secrets, or investigations, with provisions for disclosure in larger public interest.
Section 20 of the RTI Act prescribes penalties for officers who unreasonably deny access to information. Penalties include monetary fines, disciplinary action, or prosecution if the denial is found to be mala fide or arbitrary, especially when the information is wrongly withheld under exemptions.
This concise legal commentary underscores the cautious and balanced approach mandated by Section 8 of the RTI Act, 2005, ensuring that the right to information is exercised without compromising national security, individual privacy, or ongoing investigations. The courts have consistently emphasized the importance of reasons recording, public interest balancing, and strict interpretation of exemptions to prevent misuse or overreach.
Without prejudice to the provisions of section 8, a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may reject a request for information where such a request for providing access would involve an infringement of copyright subsisting in a person other than the State.
(1) Where a request for access to information is rejected on the ground that it is in relation to information which is exempt from disclosure, then, notwithstanding anything contain in this Act, access may be provided to that part of the record which does not contain any information which is exempt from disclosure under this Act and which can reasonably be severed from any part that contains exempt information.
(2) Where access is granted to a part of the record under sub-section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, shall give a notice to the applicant, informing-
(a) that only part of the record requested, after severance of the record containing information which is exempt from disclosure, is being provided; .
(b) the reasons f
(1) Where a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, intends to disclose any information or record, or part thereof on a request made under this Act, which relates to or has been supplied by a third party and has been treated as confidential by that third party, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may tie, shall, within five days from the receipt of the request, give a written notice to such third party of the request and of the fact that the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, intends to disclose the information or record, or part thereof, and invite the third party to make a submission in writing or orally, regarding whether the information should be disclosed, and such submission of the third party shall be kept in view while taking a decision about disclosure of i
(1) The Central Government shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute a body to be known as the Central Information Commission to exercise the powers conferred on, and to perform the functions assigned to, it under this Act.
(2) The Central Information Commission shall consist of
(a) the Chief Information Commissioner; and
(b) such number of Central Information Commissioners, not exceeding ten, as may be deemed necessary.
(3) The Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners shall be appointed by the President on the recommendation of a committee consisting of-
(i) the Prime Minister, who shall be the Chairperson of the committee;
&nb
(1) The Chief Information Commissioner shall hold office for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office and shall not be eligible for reappointment:
Provided that no Chief Information Commissioner shall hold office as such after he has attained the age of sixty-five years.
(2) Every Information Commissioner shall hold office for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office or till he attains the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier, and shall not be eligible for reappointment as such Information Commissioner :
Provided that every Information Commissioner shall, on vacating his office under this sub-section be eligible for appointment as the Chief Information Commissioner in the manner specified in sub-section (3) of section 12:
&n
(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), the Chief Information Commissioner or any Information Commissioner shall be removed his office only by order of the President on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity after the Supreme Court, on a reference made to it by the President, has, on inquiry, reported that the Chief Information Commissioner or any Information Commissioner, as the case may be, ought on such ground be removed.
(2) The President may suspend from office, and if deem necessary prohibit also from attending the office during inquiry, the Chief Information Commissioner or Information Commissioner in respect of whom reference has been made to the Supreme Court under sub-section (1) until the President has passed orders on receipt of the report of the Supreme Court on such reference.
(3) Notwithstanding anything
(1) Every State Government shall, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute a body to be known as the ..... (name of the State) Information Commission to exercise the powers conferred on, and to perform the functions assigned to, it under this Act.
(2) The State Information Commission shall consist of-
(a) the State Chief Information Commissioner; and
(b) such number of State Information Commissioners, not exceeding ten, as may be deemed necessary.
(3) The State Chief Information Commissioner and the State Information Commissioners shall be appointed by the Governor on the recommendation of a committee consisting of-
(i) the Chief Minister, who shall be the Chairperson of the committee;
&nbs
(1) The State Chief Information Commissioner shall hold office for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office and shall not be eligible for reappointment:
Provided that no State Chief Information Commissioner shall hold office as such after he has attained the age of sixty-five years.
(2) Every State Information Commissioner shall hold office for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office or till he attains the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier, and shall not be eligible for reappointment as such State Information Commissioner :
Provided that every State Information Commissioner shall, on vacating his office under this sub-section be eligible for appointment as the State Chief Information Commissioner in the manner specified in
(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), the State Chief Information Commissioner or a State Information Commissioner shall be removed his office only by order of the Governor on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity after the Supreme Court, on a reference made to it by the Governor, has on inquiry, reported that the State Chief Information Commissioner or a State Information Commissioner, as the case may be, ought on such ground be removed.
(2) The Governor may suspend from office, and if deem necessary prohibit also from attending the office during inquiry, the State Chief Information Commissioner or a State Information Commissioner in respect of whom a reference has been made to the Supreme Court under sub-section (1) until the Governor has passed orders on receipt of the report of the Supreme Court on such reference.
&nb
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, it shall be the duty of the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, to receive and inquire into a complaint from any person,-
(a) who has been unable to submit a request to a Central Information Officer or State Information Officer, as the case may be, either by reason that no such officer has been appointed under this Act, or because the Central Assistant Public Information Officer or State Assistant Public Information Officer, as the case may be, has refused to accept his or her application for information or appeal under this Act for forwarding the same to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer or senior officer specified in sub-section (1) of section 19 or the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be;
&
(1) Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in sub-section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may within thirty days from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision prefer an appeal to such officer who is senior in rank to the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case may be, in each public authority :
Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty days if he or she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
(2) Where an appeal is preferred against an order made by a Central Public Information Officer or a St
(1) Where the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, at the time of deciding any complaint or appeal is of the opinion that the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, has, without any reasonable cause, refused to received an application for information or has not furnished information within the time specified under sub- section (1) of section 7 or malafidely denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroyed information which was the subject of the request or obstructed in any manner in furnishing the information, it shall impose a penalty of two hundred and fifty rupees each day till application is received or information is furnished, so however, the total amount of such penalty shall not exceed twenty-five thousand rupees :
&
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or any rule made thereunder.
The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in the Official Secrets Act, 1923, (19 of 1923) and any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act.
No court shall entertain any suit, application or other proceeding in respect of any order made under this Act and no such order shall be called in question otherwise than by way of an appeal under this Act.
(1) Nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the intelligence and security organisations specified in the Second Schedule, being organisations established by the Central Government or any information furnished by such organisations to that Government:
Provided that the information pertaining to the allegations of corruption and human rights violations shall not be excluded under this sub-section:
Provided further that in the case of information sought for is in respect of allegations of violation of human rights, the information shall only be provided after the approval of the Central Information Commission, and notwithstanding anything contained in section 7, such information shall be provided within forty-five days from the date of the receipt of request.
(2) The Central Government may,
(1) The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall, as soon as practicable after the end of each year, prepare a report on the implementation of the provisions of this Act during that year and forward a copy thereof to the appropriate Government.
(2) Each Ministry of Department shall, in relation to the public authorities within their jurisdiction, collect and provide such information to the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, as is required to prepare the report under this section and comply with the requirements concerning the furnishing of that information and keeping of records for the purposes of this section.
(3) Each report shall state in respect of the year to which the report relates,(a) the number of requests made to each public autho
(1) The appropriate Government may, to the extent of availability of financial and other resources,
(a) develop and organise educational programmes to advance the understanding of the public, in particular of disadvantaged communities as to how -to exercise the rights contemplated under this Act;
(b) encourage public authorities to participate in the development and organisation of programmes referred to in clause (a) and to undertake such programmes themselves;
(c) promote timely and effective dissemination of accurate information by public authorities about their activities; and
(d) train Central Public Information Officers or State Public Information Officers, as the case may be, of public authorities and produce relevant training materials for
(1) The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely :-
(a) the cost of the medium or print cost price of the materials to be disseminated under sub-section (4) of section 4;
(b) the fee payable under sub-sections (1) of section 6;
(c) the fee payable under sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 7;
(d) the salaries and allowances payable to and the terms and conditions of service of the officers and other employees under sub-section (6) of section 13 and sub-section (6) of section
(1) The competent authority may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely :-
(i) the cost of the medium or print cost price of the materials to be disseminated under sub-section (4) of section 4;
(ii) the fee payable under sub-section (1) of section 6;
(iii) the fee payable under sub-section (1) of section 7; and (iv) any other matter which is required to be, or may be, prescribed.
(1) Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be .without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.
(2) Every rule made under this Act by a State Government shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is notified, before the State Legislature.<
(1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may, by order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removal of the difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of two years from the date of the commencement of this Act.
(2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament.
The Freedom of Information Act, 2002 (5 of 2003) is hereby repealed.
Form of Oath or Affirmation to be made by the Chief Information Commissioner/the Information Commissioner/the State Chief Information Commissioner/the State Information Commissioner
"I,..........................., having been appointed Chief Information Commissioner/ Information Commissioner/State Chief Information Commissioner/State Information Commissioner swear in the name of God that I will bear true faith and allegiance to solemnly affirm the Constitution of India as by law established, that I will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, that I will duly and faithfully and to the best of my ability, knowledge and judgment perform the duties of my office without fear or favour, affection or ill-will and that I will uphold the Constitution and the laws."
Intelligence and Security Organisation established by the Central Government
1. Intelligence Bureau.
2. Research and Analysis Wing of the Cabinet Secretariat.
3. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence.
4. Central Economic Intelligence Bureau.
5. Directorate of Enforcement.
6. Narcotics Control Bureau.
7. Aviation Research Centre.
8. Special Prontier Force.
9. Border Security Force.
10. Central Reserve Police Force.
11. Indo-Tibetan Border Poli
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
AI Assistant
