PRESIDENCY SMALL CAUSE COURTS ACT, 1882
This Act may be called the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882; and it shall come into force on the first day of July, 1882.
But nothing herein contained shall affect the provisions of the Army Act (44 & 45 Vict., c.58), {The figures "1881" were repealed by Act 12 of 1891, s.2, and Schedule I} section 151 {Coll.Stat., Vol.I}, or the rights or liabilities of any person under any decree passed before that day.
[Repeal of enactments.] Repealed by the Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938), section 2 and Schedule.
[Amendments of Acts.] Repealed by the Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938), section 2 and Schedule.
In this Act, "the Small Cause Court" means the Court of Small Causes constituted under this Act in the town of Calcutta, Madras or Bombay, as the case may be, {Inserted by Act 3 of 1899, section 2}[and the expression "Registrar" includes a Deputy Registrar].
There shall be in each of the towns of Calcutta, Madras and Bombay a Court, to be called the Court of Small Causes of Calcutta.Madras or Bombay, as the case may be.
The Small Cause Court shall be deemed to be a Court subject to the superintendence of 1 [The High Court at Calcutta], Madras or Bombay, as the case may be, within the meaning of the Letters Patent, respectively, dated the twenty-eighth day of December, 1865, for such High Courts, and within the meaning of the {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908)} Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) { Inserted by Act 1 of 1895, section 2}[and to be a Court subordinate to the High Court within the meaning of section 6 of the Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 (18 of 1879)], and the High Court shall have, in respect of the Small Cause Court, the same powers as it has under the {The Indian High Courts Act, 1861, was repealed by the G.of I.Act, 1915.See now the Constitution of India, Art.227}twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth of Victoria, Chapter 104, section 15, in respect of Courts subject to its appellate jurisdiction. {Substitute
Legal Comments
"Introductory context" - The Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 (PSCCA) creates specialized Small Causes Courts under the superintendence of the High Courts in the three presidency towns; Section 6 confirms the Small Causes Court as a subordinate court to the High Court, shaping jurisdiction and procedure. [Source: Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. VS Annamma Philips]
"Section 6 – Subordination and superintendence" - Section 6 establishes that the Small Causes Court is under the superintendence of the High Court and subject to its powers; this underpins the High Court’s revisional and supervisory reach over Small Causes Court proceedings. [Source: Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. VS Annamma Philips, Paloor Rajam Chetti VS C. Seshiah]
"Original vs appellate side distinction" - Indian courts have recognized that the distinction between Original and Appellate sides is sometimes a matter of administrative convenience, and a Single Judge on either side can be part of the High Court; this affects how injunctions or restraining orders may be issued in Small Causes contexts. [Source: Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. VS Annamma Philips]
"Section 41 – exclusive jurisdiction for landlord-tenant possession cases" - Section 41 has been interpreted as conferring exclusive jurisdiction on the Small Causes Court for suits between licensors/licensees or landlords/tenants relating to recovery of possession or related charges, subject to certain statutory exceptions; this has led to debates about when Civil Courts may or may not hear certain possession-related disputes. [Source: Narandar B. Agarwal & another VS Usman Haji Abbas & another, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe]
"Section 41(1) non-obstante clause – scope and limits" - The 1984 Maharashtra amendment (and related amendments) clarified that Section 41(1) is subject to sub-section (2), which incorporates exceptions where other Acts apply (e.g., Rent Acts); this preserves exclusive jurisdiction while accommodating special statutes. [Source: BANSI VS GOVERNOR GENERAL OF INDIA IN COUNCIL, Shantiswaroop Krishnalal Mahesh VS Laxmanrao Venkatrao Kapse & another]
"Section 41(2) – exceptions to exclusive jurisdiction" - Sub-section (2) preserves Small Causes Court exclusivity except where specified Acts (e.g., Bombay Rent Act or other enumerated statutes) apply, ensuring that in certain regulated tenancy contexts, Civil/Court proceedings may be governed by those Acts. [Source: ATULYADHAN BANERJEE VS SUDHANGSU BHUSAN DUTTA, ATULYADHAN BANERJEE VS SUDHANGSU BHUSAN DUTTA]
"Section 41 – recovery of possession in different contexts" - While Section 41 covers landlord-tenant possession disputes, courts have held that suits for possession under other statutes or for trespass may fall outside its ambit, allowing Civil Courts to adjudicate trespass or possession claims when not framed as landlord-tenant disputes. [Source: Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe, Chamanlal Dutta VS Jharna Ghosh & others]
"Section 6 – scope of Small Causes Court power" - Section 6 situates the Small Causes Court within High Court superintendence and enables the High Court to regulate procedure; it does not, by itself, expand Small Causes Court jurisdiction beyond the limits set by Section 41 and other statutes. [Source: Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. VS Annamma Philips, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe]
"Impact of amendments on jurisdictional boundaries" - Amendments such as the Maharashtra 1976 Act and subsequent related statutes have altered pecuniary limits and certain procedural aspects; courts have interpreted these changes to balance exclusive jurisdiction with practical access to relief in related regimes (e.g., Rent Acts). [Source: Shantiswaroop Krishnalal Mahesh VS Laxmanrao Venkatrao Kapse & another, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. VS Piroza Parvez Driver]
"Transfer and consolidation of suits" - Transfer powers regarding where a suit may be heard are governed by multiple statutes (CPC transfer provisions and Madras City Civil Court Act sections); High Courts retain power to transfer, subject to jurisdictional constraints, to avoid unjustly depriving a party of a forum. [Source: Dadajee Dhackjee & Co. Ltd. VS Neelam V. Rajani, P. Gnanasoundari VS Srinivasamurthy Mandiram]
"Res judicata and Small Causes judgments on title" - Decisions of the Small Causes Court on matters like title or possession can be relevant but not conclusive on title; specific Sections (47, 49 PSCCA) interplay with res judicata, sometimes allowing independent suits in competent forums. [Source: Haji Mahomed Din VS E. H. J. Allen, Haji Mahomed Din VS E. H. J. Allen]
"Bar to jurisdiction when other Acts apply" - Section 41(2) ensures that if a matter falls under a specified Act (e.g., Rent Control), the exclusive jurisdiction of the Small Causes Court may be ousted in favor of the Act’s own forum, preserving coherent statutory regimes. [Source: Narandar B. Agarwal & another VS Usman Haji Abbas & another, ATULYADHAN BANERJEE VS SUDHANGSU BHUSAN DUTTA]
"Inherent jurisdiction of Civil Courts for trespass suits" - Where a suit is essentially about trespass or possession outside the landlord-tenant framework, Civil Courts retain jurisdiction, and the PSCCA’s exclusive remit (Section 41) may not bar such suits. [Source: Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe]
"Interplay with Specific Relief Act and Section 6" - For disputes framed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act (recovery of possession on dispossession), courts have debated whether such suits fall within PSCCA Section 41’s exclusive domain, with authorities indicating nuanced outcomes depending on the exact nature of relief and possession. [Source: Narandar B. Agarwal & another VS Usman Haji Abbas & another, Syndicate Bank VS East India Hotels Ltd, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe]
"Consequences of non-jurisdiction findings" - If a Small Causes Court lacks jurisdiction, plaints can be returned to proper courts (e.g., under Order 7, Rule 10 CPC) for presentation in an appropriate forum, ensuring proper forum and remedy; this preserves procedural integrity. [Source: Narandar B. Agarwal & another VS Usman Haji Abbas & another, Chamanlal Dutta VS Jharna Ghosh & others]
"Role of Full Bench references" - Several cases show that the High Court has used references under Section 69 PSCCA to decide complex questions about original vs. appellate jurisdiction and transfer, reflecting the evolving interpretation of PSCCA’s framework. [Source: Paloor Rajam Chetti VS C. Seshiah, Haji Mahomed Din VS E. H. J. Allen]
"Practical effects for litigants" - The jurisprudence reflects a frequent tension between granting quick relief in Small Causes contexts and ensuring that complex title, possession, or tenancy questions are heard in the appropriate forum, balancing speed with substantive accuracy. [Source: Zamir Ali Khan Vs Mohammed Umar Kha, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe]
"Key takeaway" - Section 6 frames the structural relationship of Small Causes Courts to the High Court; Section 41 delineates the exclusive jurisdiction for landlord-tenant possession-related actions, with substantial exceptions; the overall regime prioritizes a streamlined forum for straightforward small-claim disputes while reserving other claims to Civil Courts or specialized Acts. [Source: Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. VS Annamma Philips, Narandar B. Agarwal & another VS Usman Haji Abbas & another, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe]
"Note on sources and references" - The above syntheses draw on court interpretations and references across multiple reported cases and collaborative notes, illustrating how Section 6 and Section 41 interact with CPC and various tenancy-related statutes. [Source: Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. VS Annamma Philips, Narandar B. Agarwal & another VS Usman Haji Abbas & another, BANSI VS GOVERNOR GENERAL OF INDIA IN COUNCIL, Shaikh Jaber Abdulah J AI Sabah VS Ravindra Mukund Chafe, Dadajee Dhackjee & Co. Ltd. VS Neelam V. Rajani]
There shall be appointed from time to time a Chief Judge of the Small Cause Court and as many other Judges as the State Government thinks fit.]
The Chief Judge shall be the first of the Judges in rank and precedence. The other Judges shall have rank and precedence as the State Government may, from time to time, direct. {Subs.by Act 3 of 1899, s.3, for the original s.
8A which had been ins.by Act 1 of 1895, s.4.}[8A.Performance of duties of absent Judge.-
(1) During any absence of the Chief Judge or any Judge of the said Court, or during the period for which any Judge is acting as Chief Judge, the State Government may appoint any person, having {Subs.by the A.O.1937 for "the qualifications required by s.7".As to requisite qualifications of Chief Judge, see Constitution of India, Art.233; of other Judges see rules under Art.234, ibid.}[the requisite qualifications], to act as Chief Judge or Judge of the said Court, as the case may be.
(1) During any absence of the Chief Judge or any Judge of the said Court, or during the period for which any Judge is acting as Chief Judge, the State Government may appoint any person, having {Subs.by the A.O.1937 for "the qualifications required by s.7".As to requisite qualifications of Chief Judge, see Constitution of India, Art.233; of other Judges see rules under Art.234, ibid.}[the requisite qualifications], to act as Chief Judge or Judge of the said Court, as the case may be.
(2) Every person so appointed shall be authorized to perform the duties of the Chief Judge or a Judge of the said Court until the return of the absent Chief Judge or Judge, or of the Judge acting as Chief Judge, or until the State Government sees cause to cancel the appointment of such acting Chief Judge or Judge, as the case may be.
(1) The High Court may, from time to time, by rules {Cf.the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908), s.8, proviso} having the force of law,-
(a) prescribe the procedure to be followed and the practice to be observed by the Small Cause Court either in supersession of or in addition to any provisions which were prescribed with respect to the procedure or practice of the Small Cause Court on or before the thirty-first day of December, 1894, in or under this Act or any other enactment for the time being in force; and
{Inserted by Act 3 of 1899, section 4.} [(aa) empower the Registrar to hear and dispose of undefended suits and interlocutory applications or matters, and]
(b) cancel or vary any such rule or rules.
Rules made under this section may
Subject to such rules, the Chief Judge may, from time to time, make such arrangements as he thinks fit for the distribution of the business of the Court among the various Judges thereof.
Save as hereinafter otherwise provided, when two or more of the Judges sitting together differ on any question, the opinion of the majority shall prevail; and if the Court is equally divided, the Chief Judge, if he is one of the Judges so differing, or, in his absence, the Judge first in rank and precedence of the Judges so differing, shall have the casting voice.
The Small Cause Court shall use a seal of such form and dimensions as are for the time being prescribed by the State Government. {Substituted by the A.O.1937 for the original section 13.}
Legal Comments
"Introduction" - The Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 governs summary proceedings for possession and related relief in small causes courts within presidency towns; it frames jurisdiction, procedure, and remedies distinct from regular Civil Procedure Code suits. [Vinayak alias Janardan Todankar VS Murlidhar Ramchandra Kowli & others - 1989 0 Supreme(Bom) 330]
"What Section 12 Says" - Section 12 defines what constitutes a suit for possession under the Act and clarifies limitations on suits in certain contexts; it also delineates that the term "suit" in certain sections excludes Chapter VII proceedings unless explicitly saved; marginal notes and provisos shape interpretation. [Nalinakhya Bysack VS Shyam Sunder Haldar - 1953 0 Supreme(SC) 11], [M. L. Chakrabarty VS Olof Borin - 1923 0 Supreme(Cal) 257]
"Essential ingredients" - Key ingredients often cited: (i) existence of a landlord/tenant or licensor/licensee relationship; (ii) demand for possession or mesne profits; (iii) rack-rent or annual value thresholds; (iv) compliance with disclaimers in Rent Control Acts; (v) applicability of Code procedures where Section 43 and 48 import CPC provisions into Chapter VII proceedings. [K. Ramanujam Chettiar VS Arunachaleswarar Devastanam - 1977 0 Supreme(Mad) 379], [ATULYADHAN BANERJEE VS SUDHANGSU BHUSAN DUTTA - 1951 0 Supreme(Cal) 4], [Sangeeta Prints VS Hemal Prints & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 52]
"What Section 12 (Intro) Says" - The section contemplates possession-related relief and sets out how the Small Cause Court’s jurisdiction interacts with other Acts; interpretation has evolved via case law to ensure the Small Causes Court can adjudicate possession/specific issues within its limits, with provisos preserving access to higher courts for title or other rights. [Nalinakhya Bysack VS Shyam Sunder Haldar - 1953 0 Supreme(SC) 11], [ATULYADHAN BANERJEE VS SUDHANGSU BHUSAN DUTTA - 1951 0 Supreme(Cal) 4]
"Scope of Section" - The scope covers ejectment and related possession actions within the Small Causes framework, including concurrent applicability with other statutes (Rent Acts, Transfer of Property Act) and occasional references to other jurisdictions within India; the scope has been clarified through numerous High Court decisions (e.g., West Bengal, Bombay, Madras). [K. Ramanujam Chettiar VS Arunachaleswarar Devastanam - 1977 0 Supreme(Mad) 379], [Ramesh Behabi Ghose VS UNION OF INDIA - 1961 0 Supreme(Cal) 118]
"Scope (Ultra vires/Conflicts)" - Several decisions address whether certain rules or amendments exceed the Court’s authority (e.g., ultra vires Rule 2 of the PSCC Rules; Maharashtra amendments vis-à-vis Section 41); such rulings emphasize deference to statutory text and the need to align practice with Section 43’s CPC applicability. [Madurai Pillai VS T. Muthu Chetty - 1914 0 Supreme(Mad) 2], [K. Ramanujam Chettiar VS Arunachaleswarar Devastanam - 1977 0 Supreme(Mad) 379]
"Punishment for Section" - The Act does not prescribe criminal punishment for violations; rather, it provides civil remedies (possession, mesne profits, damages) and procedural sanctions (costs, adjournments), with outcomes shaped by CPC-influenced procedures under Section 43 and orders for possession or restitution. [Sangeeta Prints VS Hemal Prints & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 52], [Ramesh Behabi Ghose VS UNION OF INDIA - 1961 0 Supreme(Cal) 118]
"Leave to Sue under Section 18" - The Small Causes Court has discretionary leave to sue under Section 18, to be exercised case-by-case; improper rigid rules cannot be imposed, and appellate guidance urges cautious use of leave to pursue small debts claims. [Suit of Collett VS Armstrong - 1887 0 Supreme(Cal) 5]
"Decree vs. Order for possession" - Historically, orders for possession under Section 43 have been treated as not strictly decrees in a suit, with later jurisprudence clarifying when such orders function as decrees and how they interact with the CPC framework. This distinction remains central in Section 18 and 41 analyses. [Nalinakhya Bysack VS Shyam Sunder Haldar - 1953 0 Supreme(SC) 11], [BANSI VS GOVERNOR GENERAL OF INDIA IN COUNCIL - 1951 0 Supreme(Cal) 238]
"Decree for recovery of possession" - In some cases, the term "decree for recovery of possession" is interpreted broadly to include orders under Chapter VII that effect possession, but this remains a contested area with several conflicting opinions; modern courts favor a broad construction to protect tenants while preserving statutory boundaries. [ATULYADHAN BANERJEE VS SUDHANGSU BHUSAN DUTTA - 1951 0 Supreme(Cal) 4]
"Rack-rent interpretation (Section 41)" - Section 41 interpretations in Madras and Bombay courts interpret rack-rent as gross annual value for jurisdictional purposes; this determines whether a case falls within Small Causes Court jurisdiction. [K. Ramanujam Chettiar VS Arunachaleswarar Devastanam - 1977 0 Supreme(Mad) 379]
"Licensor-licensee vs landlord-tenant" - Section 41 extends to disputes between licensor and licensee as well as landlord-tenant; later Full Bench decisions in Maharashtra have refined the concept to include non-gratuitous licenses and exclude gratuitous licenses in certain contexts. [Sangeeta Prints VS Hemal Prints & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 52], [Vinayak alias Janardan Todankar VS Murlidhar Ramchandra Kowli & others - 1989 0 Supreme(Bom) 330]
"Gratuity/Licensee status" - Jurisdiction over gratuitous licensees has been contentious; Full Bench rulings in Maharashtra clarified that gratuitous licensees may fall outside Section 41’s remit, necessitating a City Civil Court or High Court route depending on valuations. [DASSI VS ISWAR GIRIDHARI JEW - 2002 0 Supreme(Cal) 679], [Vinayak alias Janardan Todankar VS Murlidhar Ramchandra Kowli & others - 1989 0 Supreme(Bom) 330], [Narandar B. Agarwal & another VS Usman Haji Abbas & another - 1982 0 Supreme(Bom) 167]
"Regulatory interplay with Rent Control Acts" - Rent Acts (Bombay Rent Act, West Bengal Rent Control, etc.) interact with PSCC Act; many cases hold that where rent control protections apply, they modify what relief is available in Small Causes Courts and may trigger preliminary issues or defenses under Section 42A/42-B (in Maharashtra), while preserving overall jurisdiction in Chapter VII. [P. Vijaykumar and others VS V. C. Gopalkrishnan - 1997 0 Supreme(Bom) 48], [Vinayak alias Janardan Todankar VS Murlidhar Ramchandra Kowli & others - 1989 0 Supreme(Bom) 330], [Ramesh Dwarkadas Mehra and others VS Indravati Dwarkadas Mehra and others - 2001 0 Supreme(Bom) 452]
"Suit for accounts exception" - Section 19(p) of PSCC Act carves out administration suits; suits for accounts may be treated as exceptions, but many cases hold that ordinary suits for accounts are not barred unless truly administrative; this affects whether such suits can be entertained in Small Causes Court. [DHARANI MOHUN ROY VS PRAFULLA KUMAR MITRA - 1951 0 Supreme(Cal) 84]
"Res judicata and title" - Section 47/49 interplay and res judicata: Small Causes Court decisions on title are not binding for title determinations; Sections 47/49 preserve independent suits for title in competent courts, avoiding res judicata foreclosure from Small Causes proceedings. [DEBABRATA MUKHERJEE VS KALYAN KUMAR RAY - 1983 0 Supreme(Cal) 34]
"Transfers and jurisdiction (Section 10/24 CPC)" - Transfer of proceedings between courts (Chief Judge) is limited; High Court or District Court typically hold transfer powers; the PSCC Act structure assigns jurisdictional boundaries that limit intra-PSCC transfers. [Dadajee Dhackjee & Co. Ltd. VS Neelam V. Rajani - 2015 0 Supreme(Bom) 1939]
"Ultra vires/policy corrections" - Some High Courts have struck down rules or amendments as ultra vires, emphasizing that the High Court’s rulemaking cannot override the statutory scheme of Section 41 and Section 43, which anchor CPC procedures in PSCC proceedings. [Madurai Pillai VS T. Muthu Chetty - 1914 0 Supreme(Mad) 2]
"Borrowed CPC procedures (Section 43)" - Since Section 43 requires CPC procedure to the extent possible, the Small Causes Court borrows CPC rules, particularly for orders, notices, and evidence, while maintaining the Act’s unique devotions; this hybrid approach has produced a substantial body of case law. [Sangeeta Prints VS Hemal Prints & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 52], [Ramesh Behabi Ghose VS UNION OF INDIA - 1961 0 Supreme(Cal) 118]
"Final takeaway" - Section 12 and related provisions of PSCC Act operate within a complex web of cross-cutting statutes (Rent Acts, CPC, transfer of property, limitation); the controlling approach is to resolve jurisdiction and whether a matter falls under Section 41/Chapter VII for possession, while preserving access to higher fora for title and certain money claims, with numerous important regional judgments shaping practice. [Nalinakhya Bysack VS Shyam Sunder Haldar - 1953 0 Supreme(SC) 11], [K. Ramanujam Chettiar VS Arunachaleswarar Devastanam - 1977 0 Supreme(Mad) 379], [Ramesh Behabi Ghose VS UNION OF INDIA - 1961 0 Supreme(Cal) 118]
There shall be appointed an officer to be called the Registrar of the Court who shall be the chief ministerial officer of the Court; there shall also be appointed a Deputy Registrar and as many clerks, bailiffs and other ministerial officers as may be necessary for the administration of justice by the Court and for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties conferred and imposed on it by this Act or any other law for the time being in force.
The Registrar and other officers so appointed shall exercise such powers and discharge such duties, of a ministerial nature, as the Chief Judge may, from time to time, by rule direct.]
The State Government may invest the Registrar with the powers of a Judge under this Act for the trial of suits in which the amount or value of the subject-matter does not exceed twenty rupees.And, subject to the orders of the Chief Judge, any Judge of the Small Cause Court may, whenever he thinks fit, transfer from his own file to the file of the Registrar any suit which the latter is competent to try.{Inserted by Act 1 of 1895, section6.}
[Explanation.-For the purposes of this section an application for possession under section 41 shall be deemed to be a suit.]
No Judge or other officer appointed under this Act shall, during his continuance as such Judge or officer, either by himself or as a partner of any other person, practice or act, either directly or indirectly, as an advocate, attorney, vakil or other legal practitioner, or be concerned, either on his own account or for any other person, or as the partner of any other person, in any trade or profession.
Any such Judge or officer so practicing, acting or concerned shall be deemed to have committed an offence under section 168 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to prohibit any such Judge or officer from being a member of any company incorporated or registered under Royal Charter, Letters Patent, {Substituted by the A.O.1950 for "Act of Parliament or Act of the Central Legislature or of any Legi
All questions, other than questions relating to procedure or practice, which arise in suits or other proceedings under this Act in the Small Cause Court shall be dealt with and determined according to the law for the time being administered by the High Court in the exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
The local limits of the jurisdiction of each of the Small Cause Courts shall be the local limits for the time being of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Court.
Subject to the exceptions in section 19, the Small Cause Court shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature--
when the amount or value of the subject-matter does not exceed two thousand rupees: and
(a) the cause of action has arisen, either wholly or in part, within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Small Cause Court, and the leave of the Court has, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, been given before the institution of the suit; or
(b) all the defendants, at the time of the institution of the suit, actually and voluntarily reside, or carry on business or personally work for gain, within such local limits; or
(c) any of the defendants at the time of the institution of the suit, actually and voluntarily resides, or c
The Small Cause Court may allow a plaintiff at or before the first hearing of a suit in which a joint and several liability is alleged on a cause of action arising either wholly or in part within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court to abandon the suit as against any defendant who does not reside or carry on business or personally work for gain within such local limits, and to sue for a decree against such defendants only as do so reside, carry on business or personally work for gain.
The Small Cause Court shall have no jurisdiction in
(a) suits concerning the assessment or collection of the revenue; {Substituted by the A.O.1937 for the original clause (b).}
[(b) suits concerning any act done by or by order of the Central Government {The words "the Crown Representative" were omitted by the A.O, 1950}, or the State Government;]
(c) suits concerning any act ordered or done by any Judge or judicial officer in the execution of his office, or by any person in pursuance of any judgment or order of any Court or any such Judge or judicial officer;
(d) suits for the recovery of immovable property;
(e) suits for the partition of immovable property;
(f
Whenever the Court finds that for want of jurisdiction it cannot finally determine the question at issue in the suit, it may at any stage of the proceedings return the plaint to be presented to a Court having jurisdiction to determine the question When the Court so returns a plaint, it shall comply with the provisions of the second paragraph of section 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908) Schedule I, Order VII, rule 10 (2)}and make such order with respect to costs as it may think just, and the Court shall for the purposes of the Indian Limitation Act, 1877 (15 of 1877),{See now the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 (9 of 1908)} be deemed to have been unable to entertain the suit by reason of defect of jurisdiction When a plaint so returned is afterwards presented to a High Court, credit shall be given to the plaintiff for the amount of the court-fee paid in the Small Cause Court in respect of the plaint i
When the parties to a suit, which, if the amount or value of the subject-matter thereof did not exceed two thousand rupees, would be cognizable by the Small Cause Court, have entered into an agreement {As to additional fee payable on the filing of such agreement, see s.71, infra}, in writing that the Small Cause Court shall have jurisdiction to try such suit, the Court shall have jurisdiction to try the same, although the amount or value of the subject-matter thereof may exceed two thousand rupees.
Every such agreement shall be filed in the Small Cause Court, and, when so filed, the parties to it shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, and shall be bound by its decision in such suit.
All suits to which an officer of the Small Cause Court is, as such, a party, except suits in respect of property taken in execution of Court its process, or the proceeds or value thereof {Inserted by Act 1 of 1895, section 10}[and all suits whereof the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds one thousand rupees] may be instituted in the High Court at the election of the plaintiff as if this Act had not been passed.
If any suit cognizable by the Small Cause Court, other than a suit to which section 21 applies, is instituted in the High Court, and if in such suit the plaintiff obtains, in the case of a suit founded on contract, a decree for any matter of an amount or value less than {Substituted by section 11, ibid., for "two thousand"} [one thousand] rupees, and in the case of any other suit a decree for any matter of an amount or value of less than three hundred rupees, no cost shall be allowed to the plaintiff;
and if in any such suit the plaintiff does not obtain a decree, the defendant shall be entitled to his costs {In the application of the Act to Madras, these words have been substituted by certain other words: see Mad.Act 1 of 1945, section 3} [as between attorney and client]. The foregoing rules shall not apply to any suit in which the Judge who tries the same certifies that it was o
[Portions of Civil Procedure Code extending to Court.] Repealed by the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1895 (1 of 1895), section 12.
Except in cases of set-off under the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882), section 111{See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908), Schedule, Order VIII, rule 6}, no written statement shall be received unless required by the Court.
When a period of eight days from the decision of a suit has expired without any application for a new trial or re-hearing of such suit having been made, or when any such application has been made within such period and such application has been refused, or the new trial or re-hearing (as the case may be) has ended, any person, whether a party to the suit or not, desirous of receiving back any document produced by him in the suit and placed on the record, shall, unless the document is impounded under section 143 of the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882),{See now Order XIII, rule 8, ibid} be entitled to receive back the same:
Provided that a document may be returned at any time before any of such events on such terms as the Court may direct: provided also that no document shall be returned which, by force of the decree, has become void or useless.
&
In any suit in which the defendant appears and does not admit the claim, and the plaintiff does not obtain a decree for the full amount of his claim, the Small Cause Court may in its discretion order the plaintiff to pay to the defendant, by way of satisfaction for his trouble and attendance, such sum as it thinks fit. When any claim preferred, or objection made, under section 278 of the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882){See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908), Schedule I, Order XXI, rule 58} is disallowed, the Small Cause Court may in its discretion order the person preferring or making such claim or objection to pay to the decree-holder, or to the judgment-debtor, or to both by way of satisfaction as aforesaid, such sum or sums as it thinks fit. And when any claim or objection is allowed the Court may award such compensation by way of damages to the claimant or objector as it thinks fit; and the order of the Court awarding or refusing such comp
Whenever the Small Cause Court issues a warrant for the arrest of a judgment-debtor or the attachment of his property, the decree-holder, or some other person on his behalf, shall accompany the officer of the Court entrusted with the execution of such warrant, and shall point out to such officer the judgment-debtor or the property to be attached, as the case may be.
When the judgment-debtor under any decree of the Small Cause Court is a tenant of immovable property, anything attached to such property, and which he might before the termination of his tenancy lawfully remove without the permission of his landlord, shall, for the purpose of the execution of such decree {Inserted by Act 4 of 1906, section 2} [and for the purpose of deciding all questions arising in the execution of such decree], be deemed to be movable property and may, if sold in such execution, be severed by the purchaser, but shall not be removed by him from the property until he has done to the property whatever the judgment-debtor would have been bound to do to it if he had removed such thing.
Whenever any judgment-debtor, who has been arrested or whose property has been seized in execution of a decree of the Small Cause Court, offers security to the satisfaction of such Court for payment of the amount which he has been ordered to pay and the costs, the Court may order him to be discharged or the property to be released.
Whenever it appears to the Small Cause Court that any judgment-debtor under its decree is unable, from sickness, poverty or other sufficient cause, to pay the amount of the decree, or, if such Court has ordered the same to be paid in instalments, the amount of any instalment thereof, it may, from time to time, for such time and upon such terms as it thinks fit, suspend the execution of such decree and discharge the debtor, or make such order as it thinks fit.
If the judgment-debtor under any decree of the Small Cause Court has not, within the local limits of its jurisdiction, movable property sufficient to satisfy the decree, the Court may, on the application of the decree-holder, send the decree for execution-
(a) in the case of execution against immovable property situate within such local limits-
{Substituted by Act 7 of 1892, section 12, for "to the High Court"} [to the Madras City Civil Court or the High Court of Judicature at Fort William or Bombay, as the case may be];
(b) in all other cases-
(c) to any Civil Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such judgment-debtor, or any movable or immovable property of such judgment-debtor, may be found. Procedure when decree transferred.-
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908)} as applied by this Act, any minor may institute a suit for any sum of money not exceeding five hundred rupees, which may be due to him under section 70 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), for wages or piecework or for work as a servant, in the same manner as if he were of full age.
Any non-judicial or quasi-judicial act which the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908)} as applied by this Act requires to be done by a Judge, and any act which may be done by a Commissioner appointed to examine and adjust accounts under section 394 of that Code as so applied, may be done by the Registrar of the Small Cause Court or by such other officer of that Court as that Court may, from time to time, appoint in this behalf. The High Court may, from time to time, by rule, declare what shall be deemed to be non-judicial and quasi-judicial acts within the meaning of this section.
The suits cognizable by the Registrar under section 14 shall be heard and determined by him in like manner in all respects as a Judge of the Court might hear and determine the same.Proviso.-
Provided that, subject to the control of the Chief Judge, any Judge of the Court may, whenever he thinks fit, transfer to his own file any suit on the file of the Registrar.
The Registrar may receive applications for the execution of decrees of any value passed by the Court, and may commit and discharge judgment-debtors, and make any order in respect thereof which a Judge of the Court might make under this Act.
Every decree and order made by the Registrar in any suit or proceeding shall be subject to the same provisions in regard to new trial as if made by a Judge of the Court. {Substituted by Act 1 of 1895 section 13, for the original Chapter VI.}
Save as otherwise provided by this Chapter or by any other enactment for the time being in force, every decree and order of the Small Cause Court in a suit shall be final and conclusive
Where a suit has been contested, the Small Cause Court may, on the application of either party, made within eight days from the date of the decree or order in the suit (not being a decree passed under section 522 of the {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908), Schedule II, section 16} Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882)), order a new trial to be held, or alter, set aside or reverse the decree or order, upon such terms as it thinks reasonable, and may, in the meantime, stay the proceedings.
Explanation.-Every suit shall be deemed to be contested in which the decree is made otherwise than by consent of or in default of appearance by the defendant.
(1) In any suit instituted in a Small Cause Court in which the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds the sum of one thousand rupees, the defendant or any one of the defendants may, before the day fixed by the summons for the appearance of the defendant or within eight days after the service of the summons on him, whichever period shall last expire, apply ex parte on an affidavit setting forth the facts on which he relies for his defence to a Judge of the High Court for an order removing the cause into the High Court {In Madras, the High Court on such an application may either remove the suit to its own file or transfer the same to the Madras City Civil Court, see Mad Act 5 of 1916, section 3}. {Substituted by Act 4 of 1906, section 3, for the original sub-section (2).}
(2) Unless the Judge is of opinion that the application has been made solely for the purpose of delay, th
(1) When a suit has been removed into the High Court under the last foregoing section, it shall be heard and disposed of by such Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, and the said Court shall have all the same powers and jurisdiction in respect thereof as if it had been originally instituted in such Court.
(2) In every suit so removed as aforesaid the affidavit filed under section 39, sub-section (1), shall be treated as a written statement of the defendant tendered under section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908), Schedule I, Order VIII, rule 11} unless the Court shall otherwise order.
(3) In every suit so removed as aforesaid credit shall be given to the plaintiff for the amount of the court-fee paid in the Small Cause Court in respect of the plaint i
{Section 41 has been virtually amended and supplemented in the City of Madras by Mad. Act 3 of 1921.}
When any person has had possession of any immovable property situate within the local limits of the Small Cause Court's jurisdiction and of which the annual value at a rack-rent does not exceed {Substituted by Act 9 of 1912, section 2, for "one"} [two] thousand rupees, as the tenant, or by permission, of another person, or of some person through whom such other person claims,
and such tenancy or permission has determined or been withdrawn,
and such tenant or occupier or any person holding under or by assignment from him (hereinafter called the occupant) refuses to deliver up such property in compliance with a request made to him in this behalf by such other person,
&nb
The summons shall be served on the occupant in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882) {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908)} for the service of a summons on a defendant.
{S.43 has been virtually amended and supplemented in the City of Madras by Mad.Act 3 of 1922.}
If the occupant does not appear at the time appointed and show cause to the contrary, the applicant shall, if the Small Cause Court is satisfied that he is entitled to apply under section 41, be entitled to an order addressed to a bailiff of the Court directing him to give possession of the property to the applicant on such day as the Court thinks fit to name in such order.
Explanation.-If the occupant proves that the tenancy was created or permission granted by virtue of a title which determined previous to the date of the application, he shall be deemed to have shown cause within the meaning of this section.
Any such order shall justify the bailiff to whom it is addressed in entering after the hour of six in the morning and before the hour of six in the afternoon upon the property named therein, with such assistants as he thinks necessary, and giving possession of such property to the applicant: and no suit or prosecution shall be maintainable against any Judge or officer of the Small Cause Court by whom any such order as aforesaid was issued, or against any bailiff or other person by whom the same was executed, or by whom any such, summons as aforesaid was served, for the issue, execution or service of any such order or summons, by reason only that the applicant was not entitled to the possession of the property.
When the applicant, at the time of applying for any such order as aforesaid, was entitled to the possession of such property, neither he nor any person acting in his behalf shall be deemed, on account of any error, defect or irregularity in the mode of proceeding to obtain possession there under, to be a trespasser; but any person aggrieved may bring a suit for the recovery of compensation for any damage which he has sustained by reason of such error, defect or irregularity:
when no such damage is proved, the suit shall be dismissed; and when such damage is proved but the amount of the compensation assessed by the Court does not exceed ten rupees, the Court shall award to the plaintiff no more costs than compensation, unless the Judge who tries the case certifies that in his opinion full costs should be awarded to the plaintiff.
Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to protect any applicant obtaining possession of any property under this Chapter from a suit by any person deeming himself aggrieved thereby, when such applicant was not at the time of applying for such order as aforesaid entitled to the possession of such property
Application for order in such case an act of trespass And when the applicant was not, at the time of applying for any such order as aforesaid, entitled to the possession of such property, the application for such order, though no possession is taken there under, shall be deemed to be an act of trespass committed by the applicant against the occupant.
{Section 47 has been amended in its application to Madras by section 2 (b) of Madras Act 3 of 927.}
Whenever on an application being made under section 41 the occupant binds himself, with two sureties, in a bond for such amount giving as the Small Cause Court thinks reasonable, having regard to the value of the property and the probable costs of the suit next hereinafter mentioned, to institute without delay a suit in the High Court against the applicant for compensation for trespass and to pay all the costs of such suit in case he does not prosecute the same or in case judgment therein is given for the applicant, the Small Cause Court shall stay the proceedings on such application until such suit is disposed of.
If the occupant obtains a decree in any such suit against the applicant, such decree shall supersede the order (if any) made
In all proceedings under this Chapter, the Small Cause Court shall, as far as may be and except as herein otherwise provided, follow the procedure prescribed for a Court of first instance by the {See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908} Code of Civil Procedure (14 of 1882).
{Section 49 has been amended in its application to the Presidency-town of Madras by Madras Act 3 of 1927, section 2 (b).}
Recovery of the possession of any immovable property under this Chapter shall be no bar to the institution of a suit in the High Court for trying the title thereto.
This Chapter extends to every place within the local limits of the ordinary original civil jurisdictions of the High Courts of Judicature at Fort William, Madras and Bombay. But nothing contained in this Chapter applies-
(a) to any rent due to Government;
(b) to any rent which has been due for more than twelve months before the application mentioned in section 53.
{Substituted by the A.O.1937 for the original section 51.Bailiffs and appraisers being servants of the Government, their remuneration and other conditions of service are now regulated by rules made, or deemed to be made, under Art.309 of the Constitution of India.}
Four or more persons shall be appointed bailiffs and appraisers for the purposes of this Chapter.]
The persons so appointed {The words "shall give security, to be approved by the said Judges, faithfully to discharge the duties of their office, and they" were repealed by the A.O.1937} shall be deemed to be public servants within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).
Any person claiming to be entitled to arrears of rent of any house or premises to which this Chapter extends, or his duly constituted attorney, may apply to any Judge of the Small Cause Court, or to the Registrar of the Small Cause Court, for such warrant as is hereinafter mentioned.
The application shall be supported by an affidavit or a affirmation to the effect of the form (marked A) in the third schedule hereto annexed.
The Judge or Registrar may thereupon issue a warrant under his hand and seal and returnable within six days, to the effect of the form (marked B) contained in the same schedule, addressed to any one of such bailiffs.
The Judge or Registrar may at his discretion, upon personal examination of the person applying for such warrant, decline to issue the same.
Every distress under this Chapter shall be made after sunrise and before sunset, and not at any other time.
The bailiff directed to make the distress may force open any stable, outhouse or other building, and may also enter any dwelling-house, the outer door of which may be open, and may break open the door of any room in such dwelling-house for the purpose of seizing property liable to be seized under this Chapter:
Provided that he shall not enter or break open the door of any room appropriated for the zenáná or residence of women, which by the usage of the country is considered private.
In pursuance of the warrant aforesaid the bailiff shall seize the movable property found in or upon the house or premises mentioned in the warrant and belonging to the person from whom the rent is claimed (hereinafter called the debtor), or such part thereof as may, in the bailiff's judgment, be sufficient to cover the amount of the said rent, together with the costs of the said distress:
Provided that the bailiff shall not seize-
(a) things in actual use; or
(b) tools and implements not in use, where there is other movable property in or upon the house or premises sufficient to cover such amount and costs; or
(c) the debtor's necessary wearing apparel; or
(d) goods in the custody of the law.
The bailiff may impound or otherwise secure the property so seized in or on the house or premises chargeable with the rent.
On seizing any property under section 57 the bailiff shall make an inventory of such property and shall give a notice in writing to the effect of the form (marked C) in the third schedule hereto annexed to the debtor, or to any other person upon his behalf in or upon the said house or premises.
Copies of inventory and notice to be filed.- The bailiff shall, as soon as may be, file in the Small Cause Court copies of the said inventory and notice.
The debtor or any other person alleging himself to be the owner of any property seized under this Chapter, or the duly constituted attorney of such debtor or other person, may, at any time within five days from such seizure, apply to any Judge of the said Court to discharge or suspend the warrant, or to release a distrained article, and such Judge may discharge or suspend such warrant or release such article accordingly, upon such terms as he thinks just,
and any of the Judges of the said Court may in his discretion give reasonable time to the debtor to pay the rent due from him.
Upon any such application, the costs attending it and attending the issue and execution of the warrant shall be in the discretion of the Judge, and shall be paid as he directs.
If any claim is made to, or in respect of, any property seized under this Chapter, or in respect of the proceeds or value thereof, by any person not being the debtor, the Registrar of the Small Cause Court, upon the application of the bailiff who seized the property, may issue a summons calling before the Court the claimant and the person who obtained the warrant.
And thereupon any suit which may have been brought in the High Court in respect of such claim shall be stayed, and any Judge of the High Court, on proof of the issue of such summons and that the property was so distrained, may order the plaintiff to pay the costs of all proceedings in such suit after the issue of such summons.
And a Judge of the Small Cause Court shall adjudicate upon such claim and make such order between the parties in respect thereof and of the costs of the
In any case under section 60 or section 61 the Judge by whom the case is heard may award such compensation by way of damages to the applicant or claimant (as the case may be) as the Judge thinks fit,
and may for that purpose make any inquiry he thinks necessary;
and the order of the Judge awarding or refusing such compensation shall bar any suit for the recovery of compensation for any damage caused by the distress.
In any case under section 60 or section 61, if the value of the subject-matter in dispute exceeds one thousand rupees, the applicant or claimant may apply to the High Court to transfer the case to itself, and the High Court, on being satisfied that it is expedient that the case should be disposed of by itself, may direct the case to be transferred accordingly, and may thereupon alter or set aside any order passed in the case by a Judge of the Small Cause Court, and may make such order therein as the High Court thinks fit,
Every application under this section shall be made within seven days from the date of the seizure of the subject-matter in dispute.
In granting applications under this section, the High Court may impose such terms as to payment of, or giving security for, costs or otherwise as it thinks fit.
&nbs
In default of any order to the contrary by a Judge of the Small Cause Court or by the High Court, any two of the said bailiffs may, at the expiration of five days from a seizure of property under this Chapter, appraise the property so seized, and give the debtor notice in writing to the effect of the form (marked D) in the third schedule hereto annexed.
The bailiffs shall file in the Small Cause Court a copy of every notice given under this section.
In default of any such order to the contrary, the distrained property shall be sold on the day mentioned in such notice, and the said bailiffs shall, on realizing the proceeds, pay over the amount thereof to the Registrar of the Small Cause Court; and such amount shall be applied first in payment of the costs of the said distress and then in satisfaction of the debt; and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the debtor:
Provided that the debtor may direct that the sale shall take place in any other manner, first giving security for any extra costs thereby occasioned.
No costs of any distress under this Chapter shall be taken or demanded except those mentioned in the part (marked E) of the third schedule hereto annexed.
{The second paragraph,, relating to the application of sums raised as costs towards payment of contingent charges and remuneration of bailiff, was repealed by the A.O.1937.}
The Registrar of the Small Cause Court shall keep a book in which all sums received as costs upon distresses made under this Chapter, and all sums paid as remuneration to the said bailiffs, and all contingent charges incurred in respect of such distresses, shall be duly entered.
He shall also enter in the said book all sums realised by sale of the property distrained and paid over to landlords under the provisions of this Chapter.
No distress shall be levied for arrears of rent except under the provisions of this Chapter;
Penalty for making illegal distresses and any person, except a bailiff appointed under section 51, levying or attempting to levy any such distress, shall, on conviction before a Presidency Magistrate, be liable to be punished with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees and with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, in addition to any other liability he may have incurred by his proceedings.
{Subs.by Act 4 of 1906, s.4, for the original s.69.}
(1) If two or more Judges of the Small Cause Court sit together in any suit, or in any proceeding under Chapter VII of this Act, and differ in their opinion as to any question of law or usage having the force of law or the construction of a document, which construction may affect the merits, or if in any suit or in any such proceeding, in which the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds five hundred rupees, any such question arises upon which the Court entertains reasonable doubt, and either party so requires, the Small Cause Court shall draw up a statement of the facts of the case and the point on which there is a difference of opinion or on which doubt is entertained, and refer such statement with its own opinion on the point for the opinion of the High Court; and the provisions of sections 619 to 621 of the {See now the
When judgment is given under section 69 contingent upon the opinion of the High Court, the party against whom such judgment is given shall at once furnish security, to be approved by the Small Cause Court, for the costs of the reference to the High Court and for the amount of such judgment:
Provided that no security for the amount of such judgment shall be required in any case in which the Judge who tried the case has ordered such amount to be paid into Court, and the same has been paid accordingly.
If no such security given, party to be deemed to have submitted to judgment.- Unless such security as aforesaid is at once furnished, the party against whom such contingent judgment has been given shall be deemed to have submitted to the same.
{For modifications with which this section applies in Bengal, see Ben.Act 4 of 1922, s.16.}
A fee not exceeding-
(a) when the amount or value of the subject-matter does not exceed five hundred rupees-the sum of two annas in the rupee on such amount or value,
(b) when the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds five hundred rupees-the sum of sixty-two rupees eight annas, and one anna in the rupee on the excess of such amount or value over five hundred rupees,
shall be paid on the plaint in every suit, and every application under {The words and figures "section 38 or" were ref.by Act 7 of 1896} section 41; and no such plaint or application shall be received until such fee has been paid.
An additional
The fees specified in the third and fourth columns of the fourth schedule hereto annexed shall be paid previous to the issue in any suit or in any proceeding under Chapter VII of this Act of the processes, to which the said columns respectively relate, by the persons on whose behalf such processes are issued, when the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds the sum specified in the first column, but does not exceed the sum specified in the second column of the said schedule {For sections 72A, 72B and 72C in force in Calcutta only, see the Presidency Small Cause Courts (Ben.Amendment) Act, 1932 (Ben.20 of 1932), section 3 and the Presidency Small Cause Courts (Ben.Amendment) Act, 1934 (Ben.8 of 1934), section 3}.
{In its application to the Court of Small Causes of Calcutta, a different section has been substituted for this section by Ben.Act 8 of 1934, section 4.}
Whenever any such suit or proceeding is settled by agreement of the parties before the hearing, half the amount of all fees paid up to that time shall be repaid by the Small Cause Court to the parties by whom the same have been respectively paid.
The Small Cause Court may, whenever it thinks fit, receive and register suits instituted, and applications under section 41 made by poor persons, and may issue processes on behalf of such persons, without payment or on a part-payment of the fees mentioned in sections 71 and 72.
The State Government may from time to time, by notification in the Official Gazette, vary the amount of the fees payable under sections 71 and 72:
Provided that the amount of such fees shall in no case exceed the amount prescribed by the said sections.
The expense of employing an advocate, vakil, attorney or other legal practitioner incurred by any party shall not be allowed as costs in any suit or in any proceeding under Chapter VII of this Act, in the Small Cause Court, in which suit or proceeding the amount or value of the subject-matter does not exceed twenty rupees, unless the Court is of opinion that the employment of such practitioner was under the circumstances reasonable.
Nothing contained in this Chapter shall affect the provisions of sections 3, 5 and 25 of the Court-fees Act, 1870 (7 of 1870).
{This power is now regulated by rules made or deemed to have been made under Art.309 of the Constitution of India.} Repealed by the A.O.1937.
[Power to fine officers.]
If any clerk, bailiff or other inferior ministerial officer of the Small Cause Court who is employed as such in the execution of any order or warrant, loses, by neglect, connivance or omission, an opportunity of executing such order or warrant, he shall be liable, by order of the Chief Judge, on the application of the person injured by such neglect, connivance or omission, to pay such sum, not exceeding in any case the sum for which the said order or warrant was issued, as, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, represents the amount of the damage sustained by such person thereby.
If any clerk, bailiff or other inferior ministerial officer of the Small Cause Court is charged with extortion or misconduct while acting under colour of its process, or with not duly paying or accounting for any money levied by him under its authority, the Court may inquire into such charge, and may make such order for the repayment or payment of any money so extorted, or of any money so levied as aforesaid, and of damages and costs, by such officer, as it thinks fit.
For the purposes of any inquiry under this Chapter, the Small Cause Court shall have all the powers or summoning and enforcing the attendance of witnesses and compelling the production of documents which it possesses in suits under this Act.
Any order under this Chapter for the payment or repayment of money may, in default of payment of the amount payable thereunder, be enforced by the person to whom such amount is payable as if the same were a decree of the Small Cause Court in his favour.
[Procedure of Court in certain cases of contempt.Record in such cases.Procedure where Court considers that case should not be dealt with under section 83.Discharge of offender on submission or apology.]Rep.by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1914 (10 of 1914), section 3 and Schedule II.
[Procedure of Court in certain cases of contempt.Record in such cases.Procedure where Court considers that case should not be dealt with under section 83.Discharge of offender on submission or apology.]Rep.by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1914 (10 of 1914), section 3 and Schedule II.
[Procedure of Court in certain cases of contempt.Record in such cases.Procedure where Court considers that case should not be dealt with under section 83.Discharge of offender on submission or apology.]Rep.by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1914 (10 of 1914), section 3 and Schedule II.
[Procedure of Court in certain cases of contempt.Record in such cases.Procedure where Court considers that case should not be dealt with under section 83.Discharge of offender on submission or apology.]Rep.by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1914 (10 of 1914), section 3 and Schedule II.
If any witness before the Small Cause Court refuses to answer such questions as are put to him, or to produce any document in his possession or power which the Court requires him to produce, and does not offer any reasonable excuse for such refusal, the Court may sentence him to simple imprisonment, or commit him to the custody of an officer of the Court, for any term not exceeding seven days, unless in the mean-time such person consents to answer such questions or to produce such document, as the case may be, after which, in the event of his persisting in his refusal, he may be dealt with according to the provisions of section {Substituted by Act 10 of 1914, section 2 and Schedule I, for "83 or section 85"} [480 or section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898)].
Any person deeming himself aggrieved by an order under {The words and figures "s.83 or" were rep.by s.3 and Sch.II, ibid.} section 87 may appeal to the High Court, and the provisions of the {Substituted by section 2 and Schedule I, ibid., for "Presidency Magistrates' Act, 1877"} [Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898)], relating to appeals shall, so far as may be, apply to appeals under this section.
Notices to produce documents, summonses to witnesses, and all other processes issued in the exercise of any jurisdiction conferred on the Small Cause Court by this Act, except summonses to defendants and writs of execution, may, if the Court by general or special order so directs, be served by such persons as the Court, from time to time, appoints in this behalf.
The Small Cause Court shall keep such registers, books and accounts and submit to the High Court such statements and returns as may, subject to the approval of the State Government, be prescribed by the High Court.
The Small Cause Court shall comply with such requisitions as may, from time to time, be made by the State Government or High Court for records, returns and statements in such form and manner as such Government or Court, as the case may be, thinks fit.
The Small Cause Court shall, at the commencement of each year, draw up a list of holidays and vacations to be observed in the Court and shall submit the same for the approval of the State Government. Such list, when it has received such approval, shall be published in the Official Gazette, and the said holidays and vacations shall be observed accordingly.
The President {The words "and Members of his Council" were repealed by the A.O.1948}, the Governors of {Substituted, ibid., for "Fort St. George"} [Madras], {Substituted by Act 7 of 1912, section 7 and Schedule E, for "and Bombay"} [Bombay and {Substituted by the A.O.1948 for "Fort William in Bengal"} [West Bengal]], {The words "and the Members of their respective Councils" were rep, by the A O.1937.The words "the Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal" were repealed by Act 7 of 1912, section 7 and Schedule E} and the Chief Justices and Judges of the High Courts {Substituted by the A.O.1950 for "established under twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth of Victoria, Chapter 104"}1[***], shall not be liable to arrest by order of the Small Cause Court.
No suit shall lie on any decree of the Small Cause Court.
Any person ordered by the Small Cause Court to be imprisoned may be imprisoned in such place as the State Government, from time to time, appoints in this behalf.
If any person against whom any suit is brought for anything purporting to be done by him under this Act has, before the institution of the suit, tendered sufficient amends to the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall not recover.
All prosecutions for anything purporting to be done under this Act must be commenced within three months after the offence was committed.
THE FIRST SCHEDULE
[Enactments repealed.] Repealed by the Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938), section 2 and Schedule.
[Portions of Civil Procedure Code extending to Court.] Repealed by the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1895 (1 of 1895), section 12.
THIRD SCHEDULE
FORMS
A
[See section 53.]
In the Small Cause Court for
A.B...........................................(plaintiff),
Versus
C.D...........................................(defendant),
A.B., of..........................................., in the town of...........................................maketh oath (or affirms) and saith that C.D.......................................,of................................,is justly indebted to....................................in the sum of Rs...................................for arrears of rent of the house and premises No
THE FOURTH SCHEDULE
[See section 72.]
FEES FOR SUMMONSES AND OTHER PROCESSES
When the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds But does not exceed Fee for summonses Fee for other processes
Rs. Rs. Rs. A. P. Rs. A. P.
0 10 0 2 0 0 2 0
10 20 0 4 0 0 4 0
20 50 0 8 0 0 8 0
50 100 1 0 0 1 0 0
100 200 1 4 0 2 0 0
200 300 1 8 0 3 0 0
300 400 1 12 0 4 0 0
400 500 2 0 0 5 0
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.