SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 488

SUJATA V. MANOHAR, A. M. AHMADI
Shaheen Welfare Association – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-This is a public interest litigation in which the petitioner has prayed for certain reliefs to undertrial prisoners charged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as TADA ). The petitioner has asked, inter alia, for a direction that the respondents should file a list of detenus lodged in jails in different States under TADA and has asked for a direction for the release of TADA detenus against whom proper evidence is not with the prosecution and where proper procedure prescribed under law is not followed.

2. Under orders passed from time to time in this petition the States of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Maharashtra as well as the Central Government have filed affidavits giving information relating to the number  of cases under TADA pending in different Designated Courts in various States of the country. We have also been furnished with the statewise numbers of Designated Courts constituted under TADA. In the affidavit filed on behalf of the Union of India by Shri A. K. Shrivastava, Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top