M. SRINIVASAN, B. N. KIRPAL, A. S. ANAND
L. R. Shivaramagowda – Appellant
Versus
T. M. Chandrashekar – Respondent
Judgment
Srinivasan, J.-These two appeal have been filed under Section 116A of the Representation of People Act 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) against the judgment and order of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore dated the 27th day of September 1991 in Election Petition No. 15 of 1990. The appellant in Civil Appeal No. 4272 of 1991 is the first respondent in the other appeal and the appellant in Civil Appeal No. 4379 of 1991 is the first respondent in the former appeal. The parties will be referred to in this judgment in accordance with their ranking in Civil Appeal No. 4272 of 1991.
2. The appellant was the successful candidate in the election held in November 1989 to 101 Nagamangala Assembly Constituency in the State of Karnataka having polled 48654 votes as against 17165 votes polled by the first respondent. The appellant contested the election as an independent candidate while the first respondent represented the Congress-I Party. The election was challenged by the first respondent on grounds of corrupt practices by the appellant falling within the scope of Section 123 of the Act. In short, the following were the allegations made by the first respondent in the E
Samant N. Balakrishna & Anr. v. George Fernandez & Ors.
Dalchand Jain v. Narayan Shankar Trivedi & Anr.
Shri Balwan Singh v. Shri Lakshmi Narain & Ors.
Om Prabha Jain v. Charan Das & Anr.
Virendra Kumar Saklecha v. Jagjiwan & Ors.
F.A. Sapa & Ors. v. Singora & Ors.
Gajanan Krishnaji Bapat & Anr. v. Dattaji Raghobaji Meghe & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.