Followed/Supported:

Multiple references (e.g., in paragraphs, citations, and case summaries) to Delta International Ltd. v. Shyam Sunder Ganeriwalla (AIR 1999 SC 2607) indicate that this case has been heavily relied upon and supported in subsequent judgments. For example:

Paragraphs referencing the case (e.g., <01100005186>, <01700053283>, <01700053240>, <01300027971>, <00400063947>, <00900046618>) suggest it has been treated as a leading authority on the principles of intention in contracts, lease vs. license, and interpretation of documents.

The case is repeatedly cited to support principles on contractual interpretation, intention, and legal distinctions, indicating it remains a good law and authoritative.

Distinguished or Cited for Principles:

Several references (e.g., <01500052995>, <00900050609>, <00400060508>) mention the case in the context of discussing principles or in relation to other authorities, which suggests it is being distinguished or used as a reference point for legal principles rather than being overruled.

Uncertain or Ambiguous Treatment:

Some references (e.g., <04200004292>, <04200002633>) mention the case in passing or in the context of discussing evidence or tenancy rights, but do not clarify whether the case’s principles are upheld or criticized.

The repeated citations do not explicitly mention any negative treatment, so these are presumed supportive or neutral unless otherwise indicated.

Other possible treatment patterns, such as criticism or questioning, are not explicitly evident from the snippets provided. The consistent referencing of Delta International Ltd. as a foundational case suggests it is still considered good law.