SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 599

A. R. LAKSHMANAN, G. P. MATHUR
Usha Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajendra Babu, CJI.-Writ Petition (Civil) No. 132 of 1995

This petition stems from a policy decision made by Maharashtra State Government whereby Marathi language study was made compulsory throughout the schools in that State. As a result, the English Medium Schools run by Gujarati linguistic minorities were compelled to teach four languages (Hindi, English, Marathi and mother tongue-Gujarati) as against the accepted three-language formula . Constitutional validity of the imposition of Marathi language as a compulsory study in schools run by linguistic minorities is the main matter for judgment in this case.

2. Petitioner s case is that the imposition of compulsory Marathi is in violation of the fundamental right of the linguistic minority to establish an educational institution of their choice under Article 30(1) of the Constitution; that the choice is meant to achieve not only the purpose of conserving the minority s mother tongue, language etc. but also giving their children a good general education; that the minority, in furtherance of their fundamental right under Article 29(1) read with Article 30(1) of the Constitution has a choice to teach the other subjects (Mat


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top