SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(SC) 2

B. P. SINHA, J. C. SHAH, K. N. WANCHOO, P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K. C. DAS GUPTA
Fateh Chand – Appellant
Versus
Balkishan Dass – Respondent


Advocates:
K.L.Mehta, M.C.SETALVAD, M.L.Bagal, MOHAN BEHARI LAL, S.K.MEHTA

Judgement Key Points

Based on the provided legal document, the suit was not primarily filed for recovery of possession or specific property. Instead, it involved a claim related to breach of a sale agreement, forfeiture of earnest money and part of the sale price, and the determination of damages and mesne profits due to wrongful possession after the contract fell through. The plaintiff sought possession and compensation for use and occupation, but the core legal action was based on breach of contract and related claims for damages, rather than a straightforward suit for recovery of property.


Judgment

SHAH, J. : By a registered deed of lease dated May 19, 1927 which was renewed on January 30 1947 the Delhi Improvement Trust granted leasehold rights for 90 years to one Dr. M. M. Joshi in respect of a plot of land No.3, E Block, Qarol Bagh, Delhi, admeasuring 2433 sq. yards. Dr. Joshi constructed a building on the land demised to him. Chandrawati, widow of Dr. Joshi as guardian of her minor son Murli Manohar by sale-deed dated April 21, 1947 sold the leasehold rights in the land together with the building to Lala Balkrishan Das who will hereinafter be referred to as Plaintiff for Rs.63,000/-. By an agreement dated March 21, 1949 the Plaintiff contracted to sell his rights in the land, and the building to Seth Fateh Chand-hereinafter called the defendant . It was recited in the agreement that the plaintiff agreed to sell the building together with pattadari" rights appertaining to the land admeasuring 2433 sq. yards for Rs.1,12,500/- and that Rs.1,000/- were paid to him as earnest money at the time of the execution of the agreement. The conditions of the agreement were :

"(1) I, the executant shall deliver the actual possession, i.e. complete vacant possession of Kothi




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top