D. A. DESAI, P. N. SHINGHAL, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V. R. KRISHNA IYER, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Sunil Batra: Charles Gurmukh Sobraj – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Administration – Respondent
JUDGMENT
KRISHNA IYER, J.:— The province of prison justice, the conceptualization of freedom behind bars and the role of judicial power as constitutional sentinel in a prison setting, are of the gravest moment in a world of escalating torture by the minions of State, and in India, where this virgin area of jurisprudence is becoming painfully relevant. Therefore, explicative length has been the result;and so it is that, with all my reverence for and concurrence with my learned brethren on the jurisdictional and jurisprudential basics they have indicated, I have preferred to plough a lonely furrow.
The Core-questions.
2. One important interrogation lies at the root of these twin writ petitions: Does a prison setting, ipso facto, out-law the rule of law, lock out the judicial process from the jail gates and declare a long holiday for human rights of convicts in confinement, and (to change the metaphor) if there is no total eclipse, what luscent segment is open for judicial justice? Three inter-related problems project themselves: (i) a jurisdictional dilemma between hands off prisons and take over jail administration (ii) a constitutional conflict between detentional security and innate
Shaik Abdul Azeez v. State of Karnataka
followed : R. L. Arora v. State of U. P.
R. C. Cooper v. Union of India
Jagmohan Singh v. State of U. P.
followed : D. Bhuvan Mohan Patnaik v. State of A. P.
D. B. Patnaik v. State of A. P.
followed : State of Maharashtra v. Sindhi alias Raman
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.