A. N. SEN, D. P. MADAN, M. P. THAKKAR, P. N. BHAGWATI, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Distributors Baroda Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
BHAGWATI, J. (For himself, Chandrachud CJI., D. P. Madon and M. P. Thakkar, JJ.) : - This writ petition raises an interesting question of construction of S. 80M of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This question would appear to be concluded in favour of the assessee by the decision of this Court in Cloth Traders Limited v. Addl. Commr. of Income-tax, 118 ITR 243: but the correctness of the view taken in that case has been challenged in the present writ petition. Since the decision in Cloth Traders case (supra) was given by a Bench of three Judges, it is obvious that its validity can be canvassed before this Bench which consists of five Judges. If this Bench too takes the same view in regard to the construction of S. 80M as that taken in Cloth Traders case (supra), it would become necessary to consider the question of constitutional validity of S. 80AA which was introduced in the Income-tax Act, 1961 by S. 12 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980 with a view to overriding with retrospective effect the construction placed on S. 80M by this Court in Cloth Traders case (supra). If on the other hand, this Bench disagrees with the view taken in Cloth Traders case (supra) and hold that even be
overruled : Chill Traders (P) Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
applied : Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. C.I.T
Commissioner of Income Tax v. South Indian Bank Ltd
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Darbhanga Marketing Co.Ltd
overruled : Cloth Traders (P) Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
Cloth Traders (P) Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.