SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 510

K.N.SAIKIA, M.M.DUTT
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Sukhpalsingh – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S.RANDHVA, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, KAMINI JAISWAL, KAPIL SIBAL, R.S.Suri

Judgment

K. N. SAIKIA, J.:- Special leave granted Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This States appeal is from the judgment of the High Court of Punjab an Haryana dated 31-7-1989 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2365 of 1988 quashing the detention order of Sukhjinder Singh, father of the respondent, under the National Security Act.

3. Sri Sukhjinder Singh has been under detention pursuant to the Government of Punjab, Department of Home Affairs an .Justices Order dated 28-5-1988, passed in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section (2) of section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (No. 65 of 1980), hereinafter referred to as the Act, read with Section 14-A as inserted by National Security (Amendment) Act, 1987, with a view to preventing him from indulging in activities prejudicial to the security of the State and maintenance of public order and interference with efforts of Government in coping with the terrorist an disruptive activities. He was furnished wiht the grounds of detention contained in paragraphs thereof and saying that on account of the said activities, the President of India was satisfied that he should be detained As no arguments have been based on the






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top