SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 662

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, S. MOHAN
Digvijay Mote – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MOHAN, J.—These writ petitions have been preferred by way of Public Interest Litigation for the enforcement of fundamental rights, political rights and fundamental duties of the people and electorate - citizens of India under, inter alia, Articles 14 and 19 read with Articles 326 and 51-A and various statutory provisions.

2. The following prayers are made before us in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 385 of 1993:

(1) direct respondent 4 to stay the proceedings and functions of the existing Lok Sabha and the privileges of its members until the disposal of this petition;

(2) direct respondent 4 to injunct the Council of Ministers headed by Mr P.V. Narasimha Rao, from aiding and advising the President forthwith;

(3) restrain the voting rights and other privileges of the elected members of Parliament from the State of Punjab until final hearing and disposal of this petition;

(4) issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or an order or injunction debarring respondent 3 from discharging the functions of or officiating as Chief Election Commissioner until the final hearing and disposal of this petition;

(5) issue a writ of mandamus against respondents 2 and 3 directing each o































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top