M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, S. MOHAN
Digvijay Mote – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
MOHAN, J.—These writ petitions have been preferred by way of Public Interest Litigation for the enforcement of fundamental rights, political rights and fundamental duties of the people and electorate - citizens of India under, inter alia, Articles 14 and 19 read with Articles 326 and 51-A and various statutory provisions.
2. The following prayers are made before us in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 385 of 1993:
(1) direct respondent 4 to stay the proceedings and functions of the existing Lok Sabha and the privileges of its members until the disposal of this petition;
(2) direct respondent 4 to injunct the Council of Ministers headed by Mr P.V. Narasimha Rao, from aiding and advising the President forthwith;
(3) restrain the voting rights and other privileges of the elected members of Parliament from the State of Punjab until final hearing and disposal of this petition;
(4) issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or an order or injunction debarring respondent 3 from discharging the functions of or officiating as Chief Election Commissioner until the final hearing and disposal of this petition;
(5) issue a writ of mandamus against respondents 2 and 3 directing each o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.