S.R.PANDIAN, M.FATHIMA BEEVI
Madan Gopal Kakkad – Appellant
Versus
Naval Dubey – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. Ratnavel Pandiyan, J. - The factual matrix leading to the filing of this appeal which is quite simple gives an account of a sordid and obnoxious incident wherein the respondent, a medical practitioner who had created a private hell of his own was gratifying this animated passions and sexual pleasure by sexually assaulting and molesting young girls not only in utter disregard of the universal moral code, human dignity, his professional ethics and values but also in flagrant violation of the law of the country.
2. The brief facts of this shameless intrigueas unravelled by the prosecution at the trial are as follows:
The respondent/accused who just then graduated from the Medical College was staying with his family consisting of his parents, his brothers, his sister-in-law Smt. Tara Dubey and niece Richa Dubey, who is the daughter of the respondents step-brother Niraj Dubey, in Adarsh Nagar, Jabalpur. His father Bhagwan Dass Dubey (D.W. 2) was a retired Professor and his sister-in-law Tara Dubey (D.W. 1) was a lecturer. His another elder brother at the relevant time of this occurrence was working as Superintendent of Police in Rajgarh District. Opposite to his house at some d
relied on : Prithi Chand v. State of H.P.
referred to : A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak
relied on : Piara Singh v. State of Punjab
Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat
Krishan Lal v. State of Haryana
Pratap Misra v. State of Orissa
Piara Singh v. State of Punjab
Sethu Madhavan Nair v. State of Kerala
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.