K.N.SINGH, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
R. S. Dass: K. Goyal: Pritam Singh: Ajit Singh Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J . :- I have had the advantage of reading the judgment in draft to be delivered by my learned brother K. N. Singh, J. I agree with him that the appeals and the writ petitions herein should be dismissed without any order as to costs. I also respectfully agree with him on the conclusions he has reached on the different contentions urged before us in these cases. It is not necessary to refer to the facts and the issues which have been exhaustively discussed by my learned brother. There is, however, one aspect of the matter on which I have certain reservations and I would like to express my views on this aspect so that the Government and the authorities concerned may try to evolve a little more objective basis on that aspect.
2. As mentioned, the validity of the Select Lists of 1978, 1979, 1980 and 1983 for promotion to the Indian Administrative Service was impugned in these matters on the ground that the Committee had not recorded any reasons for superseding the appellants and/or petitioners. The question of recording of reasons had been discussed in the decision of this Court where Select List was quashed on the ground that the Committee had failed to rec
relied on : Gurdayal Singh Fiji v. State of Punjab
distinguished : Union (if India v. Mohan Lal Capoor
relied on : A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
Union of India v. Col. J.N. Sinha
Chairman, Board of Mining Examination v. Ramjee
Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.