SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 88

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, G.P.MATHUR
Union Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela – Respondent


Judgment

G.P. Mathur, J.—Leave granted.

2. This appeal, by special leave, has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 13.12.2002 of the Bombay High Court by which the writ petition filed by respondent No.1, Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela was allowed.

3. Respondent No.1, Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela was appointed as Drugs Inspector on 11.3.1996 on short term contract basis on a fixed salary for a period of six months from the date of joining or till the date the candidate selected by Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) joined duty on regular basis, whichever was earlier. The appointment of respondent No.1 was renewed after every six months with short breaks and it continued for over five years. An advertisement was issued by the UPSC on 24.3.2001 for making regular selection on the post of Drugs Inspector. Under the relevant recruitment rules made in exercise of powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, the upper age limit for making direct recruitment is 30 years, which is relaxable for Government servants upto five years in accordance with the instructions or orders issued by the Central Government. Respondent No.1 had become over-age by two years at th





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top