P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
People’s Union for Civil Liberties – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
P.Sathasivam, CJI.
1) The present writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioners herein challenging the constitutional validity of Rules 41(2) & (3) and 49-O of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 (in short ‘the Rules’) to the extent that these provisions violate the secrecy of voting which is fundamental to the free and fair elections and is required to be maintained as per Section 128 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (in short ‘the RP Act’) and Rules 39 and 49-M of the Rules.
2) The petitioners herein have preferred this petition for the issuance of a writ or direction(s) of like nature on the ground that though the above said Rules, viz., Rules 41(2) & (3) and 49-O, recognize the right of a voter not to vote but still the secrecy of his having not voted is not maintained in its implementation and thus the impugned rules, to the extent of such violation of the right to secrecy, are not only ultra vires to the said Rules but also violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution of India besides Intern
Jyoti Basu v. Debi Ghosal [1982] 3 SCR 318 (Paras 19
N.P. Ponnuswami vs. Returning officer
Jamuna Prasad Mukhariya vs. Lachhi Ram
University of Delhi vs. Anand Vardhan Chandal, (2000) 10 SCC 648
K. Krishna Murthy (Dr.) vs. Union of India
Daryo vs. State of U.P. 1962 (1) SCR 574 (Para 23)
Lily Thomas vs. Speaker, Lok Sabha
Mohinder Singh Gill and Another vs. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.