FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, C.NAGAPPAN
Umesh Goel – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.
1. An interesting but very important legal question arises for consideration in this appeal relating to interpretation of Section 69(3) of the Indian Partnership Act with reference to its applicability to Arbitral proceedings.
2. The facts are not in controversy which can be briefly stated as under: The respondent which is a Cooperative Group Housing Society invited tenders for construction of 102 dwelling units with basement at Plot No. 21 Sector 5, Dwarka New Delhi. The tenders were invited in May 1998. The appellant, an unregistered partnership firm submitted its bid in response to the said tender on 06.05.1998. The appellant was the successful bidder and the contract was awarded to the appellant at an estimated cost of Rs.9.80 crores. The appellant was issued a letter of intent. On 09.08.1998 the appellant submitted its first bill for the construction of the compound wall etc. The agreement for the construction of 102 dwelling units with basement was entered into between the appellant and the respondent on 02.02.1999. It is stated that there was some delay in getting the plan sanctioned, which according to the appellant, he was not r
Jagdish Chander Gupta v. Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd.
Kamal Pushp Enterprises v. D.R. Construction Co.
Firm Ashok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja
Panchu Gopal Bose v. Board of Trustees for Port of Calcutta
M/s. Consolidated Engg. Enterprises v. Principal Secy. Irrigation Deptt.
State of W.B. v. Sadan K. Bormal
Raj Kumar Khurana v. State of (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi Development Authority v. Kochhar Construction Work
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.