The provided legal document primarily discusses the constitutional validity of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and the principles surrounding bail, discrimination, arbitrariness, and fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. It emphasizes that laws must not be manifestly arbitrary or discriminatory and must bear a rational relation to the objective they seek to achieve. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness, equality before the law, and the protection of personal liberty.

However, the judgment does not specifically address issues related to the issuance, conditions, or confiscation of passports, especially in cases where passports are issued on an urgent basis without disclosing or recording criminal antecedents. The focus is on procedural fairness, constitutional protections against arbitrary laws, and the rights of individuals in relation to bail and criminal proceedings, rather than the specific legal regime governing passports or their confiscation.

Therefore, this judgment does not explicitly support or oppose the saying "Where a passport is issued on an urgent basis and no criminal antecedents are disclosed or recorded therein, such passport is not liable to confiscation." It does not provide any direct legal principles or rulings concerning passport issuance or confiscation, and thus, its support or contradiction of that statement cannot be inferred from the content provided.