A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Babulal Vardharji Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.
Introductory with brief outline and issue involved
1. This appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 1 [Hereinafter also referred to as 'the Code' or 'IBC.] is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.05.2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi2 [Hereinafter also referred to as 'the Appellate Tribunal' or 'NCLAT'.] in Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency No. 549 of 2018 whereby, the Appellate Tribunal has rejected the contention that the application made by respondent No. 2 under Section 7 of the Code, seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process 3 ['CIRP' for short.] in respect of the debtor company (respondent No. 1 herein), is barred by limitation; and has declined to interfere with the order dated 09.08.2018, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench 4 [Hereinafter also referred to as 'the Adjudicating Authority' or 'the Tribunal' or 'NCLT.] in CP(IB)-488/I&BP/MB/2018, for commencement of CIRP as prayed for by the respondent No. 2.
2. A brief introduction o
Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank: (2018) 1 SCC 407 – Relied [Para 7.1]
K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank
Vashdeo R. Bhojwani v. Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Gaurav Hargovindbhai Dave v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Anr.
Jignesh Shah and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.. 2019 SCC Online 1254 – Relied [Para 13.5]
Jignesh Shah and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.