SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 195

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.
Gambhirdan K Gadhvi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Gujarat and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1525 of 2019
Decided On : 03-03-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Advocate, Gwen Karthika, Advocate, Mr. Ravindra Sadanand Chingale, Advocate, Mr. M. R. Sinha, Advocate, Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Advocate, MS. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate, MS. Srishti Mishra, Advocate, Ms. Deepanwitapriyanka, Advocate

Headnote:(A) University Grants Commission Regulations, 2010 - Regulation 7.3.0 - Writ of quo warranto - Challenge to the appointment of the Vice Chancellor of Sardar Patel University due to non-fulfillment of eligibility criteria as prescribed by UGC Regulations for such appointments - Supreme Court finds that the appointment was contrary to UGC Regulations and mandates that state governments ensure compliance with these guidelines to ensure accountability and transparency in educational appointments. (Paras 15, 17)

(B) Public office - The post of Vice Chancellor considered a public office requiring the highest standards of competence and integrity reflecting the need for effective governance in higher education.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the appointment of the Vice Chancellor of Sardar Patel University based on claims that the appointee did not meet the UGC's minimum ten-year experience requirement as a professor, arguing that the selection committee was not constituted lawfully per UGC guidelines. The High Court earlier rejected the petition, but the Supreme Court continued to observe untimely compliance with UGC regulations in appointments.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that the appointment at issue contravened UGC Regulations regarding eligibility for Vice Chancellors, emphasizing the need for states to coordinate their educational laws with UGC standards. The Court further urged the Gujarat government to amend local statutes to align with federal requirements and limit arbitrary appointments.

Issues: The key issues revolved around the validity of the Vice Chancellor’s appointment in light of UGC regulations and whether the state laws were sufficient to govern such appointments.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reiterated that UGC regulations command binding authority over state universities receiving funding, and non-compliance undermines educational integrity, thereby justifying the issuance of a writ of quo warranto to correct illegal appointments.

Result: The writ petition is allowed, quashing the appointment as illegal.

JUDGMENT :

M. R. Shah, J.

By this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for a writ of quo warranto challenging the appointment of respondent No. 4 as a Vice Chancellor of respondent No. 2 - Sardar Patel University (hereinafter referred to as "SP University") and to quash and set aside the notification dated 29.08.2019, bearing No. GH/SH/76/SPY/122010/2626/KH-2 passed by respondent No.1 - State of Gujarat, appointing respondent No. 4 as the Vice Chancellor of the respondent - SP University. The petitioner has also prayed for any other appropriate writ, direction and order directing respondent authorities to recover from respondent No. 4 all consequential benefits not limited to pay, with retrospective effect, that have been extended to him by virtue of his illegal appointment as Vice Chancellor of the SP University.

2. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that the University Grants Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "UGC") framed UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the "UGC Regulations, 2010") which, inter alia, prescribes in Regulation 7.3.0 that a person shall have ten years of teaching work experience as a professor in the University system. It also provides for constitution of a Search Committee consisting of a nominee of the Visitor/Chancellor, a nominee of the Chairman of UGC, a nominee of Syndicate/Executive Council of the University. That the Search Committee has to recommend the names of suitable candidates for appointment as Vice Chancellor of a University.

2.1 That the UGC Regulations, 2010 has been substituted subsequently vide UGC Regulations, 2018 with slight modifications which shall be referred to hereinbelow.

2.2 It is the further case on behalf of the petitioner that the Union Ministry of Human Resource Development laid down a Scheme of revision of pay of teachers and equivalent cadres in the Universities following the 6th Central Pay Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Scheme"). The Scheme provides a fixed pay of Rs. 75,000/- along with a special allowance of Rs. 5,000/-per month to the Vice Chancellor. Para 8(p)(v) of the said Scheme provides that it is extended to Universities, Colleges and other higher educational institutions coming under the purview of the State Legislature, provided the State Governments wish to adopt and implement the scheme with certain conditions, inter alia, financial assistance from the Central Government to the extent of 80% of the maintenance expenditure and remaining 20% shall be met by the State Government. Payment of Central assistance for implementing the scheme was subject to the condition that the entire scheme of revision of pay scales together with all the conditions to be laid down by the UGC by way of regulations and other guidelines shall be implemented by the State Governments and the Universities thereunder without any modification. According to the petitioner, the State of Gujarat passed a Resolution dated 11.11.2009 adopting the Scheme. Since the Scheme has been adopted, all regulations framed by the UGC are binding upon the State of Gujarat including the respondent - SP University. That on adoption of the Scheme by the State Government as well as the SP University, the said University is receiving Central financial assistance under the Scheme and is included in the list of State universities receiving Central financial assistance as per Section 12 (b) of the UGC Act, 1956. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that since the Scheme has been adopted, all regulations framed by the UGC are binding upon the State of Gujarat including the SP University.

2.3 The UGC addressed a communication dated 11.08.2014 to H.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top