SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 847

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, SURYA KANT
Zakir Abdul Mirajkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Aabad Ponda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Sajid Imtiyaz Mahat, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv. Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Adv. Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Manya Hasija, Adv. Mr. Akash Singh, Adv. Mr. Nihar Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Akshat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sheezan Hasmi, Adv. Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR Mrs. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, AOR Mr. Kunal Verma, AOR Mr. Atmaram NS Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Mr. Salvador Santosh Rebello, AOR Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kanishk Arora, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Vardhan, Adv. Mr. Yugandhara Pawar Jha, AOR Mr. Pradeep Rai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anand Mishra, AOR Mr. Amrendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Shree Prakash Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. Nawalendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Raja Thakare, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv. Mr. Akash Kavade, Adv.

Table of Content
1. overview of organized crime and mcoca (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding confessions and procedural safeguards under mcoca (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. analysis of mcoca and organized crime definitions (Para 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22)
4. discussion of the necessity and validity of approval under mcoca (Para 70 , 76)
5. final decision on the appeals and eligibility for bail (Para 80 , 81)

Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.

A. Facts

2. Salim Mulla is alleged to be a bookie who accepts bets for the Mumbai Matka. It is the prosecution’s case that he would transfer the money he received through the Mumbai Matka to Rakesh Agarwal and Manish Agarwal if he anticipated that he would be unable to repay in the event that the number on which he accepted the highest number of bets was declared the winning number. Rakesh Agarwal and Manish Agarwal would allegedly accept the risk and discharge the obligation to pay the gamblers if that particular number was indeed declared the winning number. Further, they would in turn allegedly transfer the money they receiv


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top