UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Mohd. Firoz – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant application has been filed by the applicant-appellant seeking the following prayers:
(a) Pass an order clarifying that pursuant to the Judgment of this Hon’ble Court dated 19.04.2022 in Criminal Appeal No. 612 of 2018, the sentence to be served by the Applicant is life imprisonment simplicitor for the offence under Section 302, 5(m), (i) and 6 of the Protection of Children under Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO), imprisonment for a term of 20 years for the offence under Section 376A, IPC, rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence under Section 366, IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 7 years for the offence under Section 363, IPC.
(b) Pass an order clarifying that the sentence imposed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Seoni under Sections 376(2)(m) and 376(2)(i), IPC has been substituted/subsumed by this Hon’ble Court in Judgment dated 19.04.2022 in Criminal Appeal 612 of 2018 by imposing a sentence of imprisonment for 20 years under Section 376A, IPC.
(c) Pass an order clarifying that the sentence to be served by the applicant for the offence under Sections 5(m) and (i), 6, POCSO is life imprisonment and not life imprisonment for the reminder of natural life.
(
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.