ABHAY S. OKA, SANJAY KAROL
Sathyan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL J.
1. This appeal is at the instance of the Accused-Appellant namely, Sathyan against the order and judgment dated 5thSeptember, 2019 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal No. 2822 of 20081[Hereinafter referred to as the "impugned judgment"], wherein his prayer to set aside the conviction in S.C. No. 1140 of 2006 under Section 8 of the Abkari Act, was denied and the findings returned by Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track (Ad Hoc-11), Kozhikode, in judgment dated 3rd November, 2008, were endorsed.
BRIEF FACTS
2. On 1st October 2003, the Appellant was arrested for carrying five litres of Arrack, in a jerry can, in his autorickshaw. The case was registered before the court of the Judicial Ist Class Magistrate, Kunnamangalam taking on the number C.P.36/06. Subsequently, the matter was committed, and eventually, made its way to the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track (Ad Hoc- 11), Kozhikode2[Hereinafter “trial court”].
3. Having framed 3 issues for consideration, the learned trial Court examined the testimonies of PW–1 who was the Excise Inspector Kunnamangalam range and the person who had detected the o
Santosh T.A. & Anr. v. State of Kerala [2017 (5) KHC 107] – Referred [Para 7]
Karamjiti Singh v. State (Delhi Administration)
Mukesh Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
Pramod Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Sunil (2001) 1 SCC 652 – Relied. [Para 22]
Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.