SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 785

S.RAVINDRA BHAT
DILBAGH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Aneja

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) THE claim in these proceedings under article 226 of the Constitution of India is for a direction to the respondent Nos 1 and 2 (hereafter dtc) setting aside an order of premature retirement, passed against the petitioner, due to his contracting an injury while on duty, as a driver with the dtc. A decision of the third respondent (hereafter chief Commissioner) declining relief under provisions of the Persons with Disabilities ( Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full participation) Act, 1995 (hereafter called the Act), has been questioned.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was recruited as a driver, by the dtc in 1983. He continued in its services, and worked in that capacity, when, on 1-10-1991, as he was driving a bus on route from Delhi to Balaji, the vehicle was intercepted, surrounded by an irate mob in Oranda village, and not allowed to proceed further. The bus contained 60 passengers, who were forced to get down. The mob pelted stones, caused damage to it, and sought to put fire to the bus. The petitioner interceded, and incurred the wrath of the mob, who rained lathi blows on him. He was hit on the back of his head, and lost consciousness. The police









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top