SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 580

P.K.BAHRI
POLSON LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
POLSON DAIRY LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashim Vachar, HEMANT SINGH, R.K.Anand, S.PAPPU, Vikram Dholakia, VIVEK DHOLAKIA

P. K. Bahri, J.

( 1 ) I have heard arguments for deciding these two applications, one moved by the plaintiff seeking interim injunction till the disposal of the suit and the other moved by the defendants seeking vacation of the exparte interim injunction granted by this Court.

( 2 ) FACTS leading to the filing of these two applications, in brief, are that in the year 1888, one Seth Pestunji Edulji Poison had started business of selling coffee in Bombay and in 1900, he started using the trade mark polson which was part of his name for selling coffee. Subsequently, he expanded his business and in about 1915 he had started marketing and selling butter, cheese, flour, etc. besides coffee under the said trade mark polson . It is the case of the plaintiff that the brand polson became immensely popular due to its high quality goods. polson rather became synonymous with quality butter being marketed under the said name in the minds of the people. In about 1930, he had developed a modern dairy at Anand (Gujarat) by the name of Poison Model Dairy which inter-alia produced butter under mechanised process. In the year 1938, Polson Private Limited was incorporated to further expand the b







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top