SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Antosh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Index to the Judgment
Factual Background
Submissions By Learned Counsels
Analysis and Findings
i. Analysis of Evidence
ii. Denial of Opportunity to Prosecutor to Cross-Examine Hostile Witness
iii. Impact of Witness turning Hostile during Cross-Examination
iv. Fair Trial: Right of State vs. Right of Accused
v. Multi-fold responsibilities of Public Prosecutors
vi. Right of Public Prosecutors to effectively defend the State
vii. Duty of Court to balance the Two Competing Rights
Conclusion
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C') seeking setting aside the impugned judgment dated 30.03.2009 and order on sentence dated 13.04.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court') in Sessions Case 257/06, arising out of FIR No. 419/2005, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar under Sections 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (`IPC'), whereby learned Trial Court convicted the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 326/324 of IPC. By virtue of order on sentence dated 13.04.2009, the appellant w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.