SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Arvind Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
INDEX TO THE JUDGMENT
PRELUDE
BACKGROUND FACTS
The Allegations
History of Judicial Proceedings
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. 2
THE ORDERS IMPUGNED BEFORE THIS COURT
ANALYSIS & FINDINGS
I. ARGUMENT THAT THE COMPLAINT WAS WITHDRAWN EARLIER
II. THE OFFENCE OF DEFAMATION
Meaning and Definition
Provisions of Law
Essential Ingredients to Constitute Offence of Defamation
Issuance of Process/Summons vis-a-vis Offence of Defamation: Material Considerations
III. BALANCING CRITICAL YET COMPETING INTERESTS: FREEDOM OF SPEECH & EXPRESSION Vs PROTECTING A PERSON FROM REPUTATIONAL INJURY
IV. MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF ADJUDICATING GREY AREA OF LAW NOT YET EFFECTIVELY ADJUDICATED UPON: LAYING FOUNDATION STONE OF JURISPRUDENCE
Pace of Spread of Scandalous Content: From the Echo of Whispers in Pre-Digital Era compared to the Spread at Lightning Speed of Digital Dissemination in Digital Era
V. 'RETWEETING' A DEFAMATORY IMPUTATION WILL AMOUNT TO 'PUBLICATION' FOR THE PURPOSE OF APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 499 OF IPC
VI. REACH & INFLUENCE OF THE PERSON RETWEETING DEFAMATORY CONTENT
VII. WILL EVERY 'RETWEET' ATTRACT ACTION UNDER SECTION 499 OF IPC?
VIII. WHETHER PETITI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.