SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Satish Chandra Verma - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5334 of 2021 & CM Appls. 16440-16444 of 2021 and 17362 of 2021 with W.P.(C) 5350 of 2021 & CM Appls. 16501-16505 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 5354 of 2021 & CM Appls. 16513-16517 of 2021
Decided On : 28-05-2021




Disciplinary Authority must adhere to procedural requirements and cannot finalize decisions without UPSC advice and representation from the petitioner.

Headnote:(A) Union of India Act, 1962 - Disciplinary Proceedings - Procedures under the Act require that after obtaining advice from UPSC and representation from the petitioner, the Disciplinary Authority shall make a decision - As per the court order, a final decision cannot be made for at least three months. (Paras 3-4)

(B) Judicial Direction - The court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to expedite hearing of the matters to be held on a specific date and emphasized parties' commitment not to seek adjournments. (Paras 5-6)

(C) Court's Orders - The present writ petitions and applications are disposed of with a directive for expedited resolution. (Paras 7-9)

Facts of the case:
The petition involves an individual challenging disciplinary proceedings by the Union of India, with an ongoing recommendation and representation process pending finalization by the Disciplinary Authority.

Findings of Court:
The court encourages expedience in the matter, aiming for decisions within a specified timeline of three months.

Issues: The court addressed the timeline for the completion of the disciplinary process and the obligation of the Disciplinary Authority to act upon advice and submissions before making a decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessary procedural adherence by the Disciplinary Authority, underlining that no decisions are to be finalized until the prescribed advice and representation are duly considered.

Result: Present writ petitions and pending applications stand disposed of.

Table of Content
1. hearing conducted via video conferencing. (Para 1)
2. respondent's filing of written submissions and procedure explained. (Para 2 , 3)
3. timeframes for tribunal's hearing and disposals established. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. final order and procedural directions issued. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. In pursuance to the last order, both the parties have filed their written submissions.

3. In the respondents' written submissions, it is stated that the Ministry is in the process of sending its enquiry report to the UPSC for its advice after taking approval from the Disciplinary Authority and thereafter, the said advice shall be sent to the petitioner to file his representation. It is further stated that after receipt of the representation of the petitioner, the same shall be placed before the Disciplinary Authority, who will take its decision considering the enquiry report, advice of UPSC and representation of the petitioner.

4. From the aforesaid, it is apparent that no final decision can be taken by the Disciplinary Authority for atleast three months.

5. Since both the parties have filed their short written submissions and the matters have already been directed to be listed by the Central Administrative Tribunal for hearing and disposal in the first week of July, 2021, this Court directs the Tribunal to take up the matters for hearing and disposal on 06th July, 2021 by virtue of physical or virtual mode as may be convenient to it. Learned counsel for the parties assure and undertake to this Court that they shall not seek any adjournment before the Tribunal.

6. The statements made by the learned counsel for the parties are accepted by this Court and the parties are held bound by the same. The Tribunal is directed to dispose of the petitions filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, but not later than three months from today.

7. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petitions and pending applications stand disposed of.

8. The Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Registrar of Central Administrative Tribunal forthwith for necessary information and action.

9. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top