SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Satish Chandra Verma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. In pursuance to the last order, both the parties have filed their written submissions.

3. In the respondents' written submissions, it is stated that the Ministry is in the process of sending its enquiry report to the UPSC for its advice after taking approval from the Disciplinary Authority and thereafter, the said advice shall be sent to the petitioner to file his representation. It is further stated that after receipt of the representation of the petitioner, the same shall be placed before the Disciplinary Authority, who will take its decision considering the enquiry report, advice of UPSC and representation of the petitioner.

4. From the aforesaid, it is apparent that no final decision can be taken by the Disciplinary Authority for atleast three months.

5. Since both the parties have filed their short written submissions and the matters have already been directed to be listed by the Central Administrative Tribunal for hearing and disposal in the first week of July, 2021, this Court directs the Tribunal to take up the matters for hearing and disposal on 06th July, 2021 by virtue of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top