Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Vivek Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General, Delhi High Court – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to evaluation based on answer key. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims of erroneous evaluation and requested reassessment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. scope of judicial review on evaluation tests. (Para 12) |
| 4. judicial review limited to demonstrably incorrect evaluations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 24) |
| 5. limitations of objecting past the evaluation stage. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. final determination on challenge to specific questions. (Para 25 , 56 , 70) |
| 7. court's dismissal of petitions. (Para 75) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioners have filed the present petitions impugning the final answer keys of the Delhi Judicial Service Preliminary Examination, which was declared after considering the objections raised by various candidates. According to the petitioners, answers to certain questions are not the appropriate answers and therefore, evaluation of the answer sheets is flawed.
2. The petitioners have been unsuccessful in being short-listed to appear for the Delhi Judicial Service Mains Examination as the marks secured by them in the preliminary examination fall short of the specified threshold. The petitioners state that if they are award
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
