SHABIHUL HASNAIN, S.K.SINGH
BALBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Sri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Udyan Nandan, learned Advocate who appeared in support of this petition and Sri Jyotindra Mishra, learned Advocate General, Sri S. G. Hasnain, learned Additional Advocate General, Sri M. C. Chaturvedi, Chief Standing Counsel who appeared for the respondent No. 1 and 4, Sri Dinesh Dwivedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Yashwant Verma, learned Advocate who appeared for the respondent No. 3.
2. Writ petition, counter affidavit, rejoinder affidavit and a supplementary affidavit filed by respondent No. 3 dated 27.7.2009 received on 12.8.2009 to which, on asking no response is filed are on record and they are perused.
3. By means of this writ petition prayer is to quash the notifications dated 15.10.2007 (annexure No. 1 to the writ petition ) and notification dated 4.1.2008 (annexure No. 2 to the writ petition) issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). There is a further prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from interfering in the possession of the petitioners over plot No. 437 situated at vi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.