SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(MP) 688

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA, A.K.GOHIL
VIJAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Atul Gupta, Brijesh Sharma, J.P.Gupta

A. K. SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) FEELING aggrieved by judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 3rd March, 1990 passed by learned sessions Judge, Morena in Sessions Trial No. 72/89, convicting the appellant under Section 302, IPC and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment of life, the appellant has knocked the door of this Court by preferring an appeal under section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

( 2 ) THE facts shorn of unnecessary details lie in a narrow compass. It is the case of prosecution that Roshanbai (hereinafter referred to as the "deceased") was a concubine of accused/appellant. The deceased was residing with her mother Almadi Bai in subhash Nagar of the township of Morena. On the fateful day i. e. , 17-12-1988, at 12 in the noon, accused armed with single barrel gun arrived at the house of the deceased and was talking with her inside the room. At 1. 30 p. m. accused asked the deceased not to go to Ambah. It is said that at that juncture Afhis Khan arrived there to carry the deceased with him. The deceased was pacifying the accused that she will return after two days, on which the accused again told her not to go, as a result of which she st



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top