Back
S. K. SETH, R. S. JHA, NANDITA DUBEY, RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY, SANJAY DWIVEDI
LAL SAHAB BAIRAGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
ORDER S. K. SETH, C. J. : – This reference to the Full Bench arises on the following facts.
2. Petitioner was posted as a Chief Municipal Officer, Majholi. He was prosecuted and convicted by the Special Judge (PC Act) for offences punishable under section 409, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and section 13(i)(d) read with section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The learned trial Judge found him guilty, therefore convicted and sentenced him to undergo period of sentence awarded. Against the conviction and sentence, petitioner preferred a Criminal Appeal and this Court has suspended the jail sentence awarded to the petitioner. After retirement, by order dated 8-8-2016, State Government forfeited pension of the petitioner.
3. Petitioner challenged the order dated 8-8-2016 in this Court and contended that the said order is unsustainable in law as no opportunity of hearing was afforded to him before passing the order dated 8-8-2016. In support of the contention, reliance was placed on the full Bench decision in the case of Ram Sewak Mishra vs. State of M. P., reported in 2017(4) M.P.L.J. (F.B.) 428 wherein the majority approved the decision of the learned Single Judge in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
