SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 475

VIVEK RUSIA
Hardeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Bharat Yadav for petitioner; Pradyumna Kibe, Panel Lawyer for respondent / State.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the externment order dated 28.10.2020 passed by the District Magistrate, Indore and appellate order dated 26.1.2021 passed by the Commissioner, Indore Division, Indore by which has been directed to leave the territory of District Indore and nearby districts viz. Ujjain, Dhar, Dewas, Khargone and Khandwa for the period of six months.

2. Superintendent of Police (SP) - East, District Indore vide letter dated 15.10.2020 requested the District Magistrate, Indore for initiation of proceedings u/s. 5(a) and (b) of Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as “the Adhiniyam, 1990”) against the petitioner. In the aforesaid letter, the SP gave the details of 7 criminal cases registered against the petitioner from the period Yr 2013 to Yr 2020 and pleaded that because of his criminal activities and nuisance in the society, witnesses are not coming forward to give evidence against him and his movement or act may cause danger or harm to the person or property.

3. Vide order dated 15.10.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top